Locke is a dumb ass
Woohoo! Something was finally revealed. The biggest mystery of the season is now solved. We know where the VW with beer came from!!! I really could care less about the smoke monster now that this major loose end has been tied up.
As far as the “Evil Dead” cabin scene with the invisible man. I literally was laughing so hard during this scene I missed some of it. But I’m glad that they are going towards more of a comedy type feel to the show. I think it really works.
And finally, if anyone thinks Locke really died, you haven’t been watching Lost very long have you?
Written by on May 10th, 2007 with
299 comments.
Read more articles on Posts.
- [+] Digg: Feature this article
- [+] Del.icio.us: Bookmark this article
- [+] Furl: Bookmark this article

Still waiting to watch here in Hawaii but man, that VW van thing is causing heart palpitations.
And let’s just say, as stupid as locke has become at times this season, if he is one of the 5+ body count to end the season, then I’m out…that would literally be the straw.
But, I can’t comment until I’ve watched it so…I’ll be back!!
I agree, if Locke goes (although he shouldn’t/won’t) then so do I.
Oh my God, I actually AGREE with something you wrote. I am going home and taking a sick day….
Locke being alive (or dead) won’t shock me… I’m way past the point where the show shocked me anymore.
Except if the lost writers would produced a character that didn’t have a lame-ass pathetic father… that would fuckin floor me. I’m expecting a Vincent flash back at some point, where we learn that his father dug up flower beds and growled at schoolgirls.
You know, the first time that I started to hate the show was when Kate wouldn’t tell anyone… especially Jack… about the medical station (and somehow got Claire to play along). It was a huge, plot changing thing. The “others” transformed from mysterious to play-acting.
Now she believes “He has a right to know”!!?!!
WTF???
I believe the reason they drop plot lines for months on end is that they hope we forget them, because they are incapable of making a consistent plot line.
The Kate charcter is repugnant. She embodies the undying loyalty that the diehard fans have towards Jack. He can do no wrong in the eyes of either, and they all grew up with mommy telling them to marry a doctor.
Indeed. Truly revolting. Her repugnance is surpassed by Jack’s however.
“the lost writers would produced a character that didn’t have a lame-ass pathetic father… that would fuckin floor me. I’m expecting a Vincent flash back at some point, where we learn that his father dug up flower beds and growled at schoolgirls.”
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
I’m waiting for the flashback where we find out Smokie’s dad locked him inside a sonic fence for days on end while he went on benders eating natives.
The smoke beast is Jacob, he lives in a van down by the river.
Did anyone notice the random bottles of, like, urine in Jacob’s shack of love?
His real name then is clearly Matt Foley- nice one!
LMAO!
Bad dog, bad!
Vincent’s daddy had the mange! That’s what made him crazy enough to bite the mailman… who was really Jack’s uncle’s cousin’s neighbor’s son, who knew a captain in the army who once played poker with Kelvin before he got the purple heart and then moved out west and married the daughter of Boone’s friend’s sister’s grandfather’s nephew’s cousin (twice-removed.)
Whoa… it’s all connected, man!
We all hope that Vincent, like Jin, will never suffer the shame of knowning that his mamma was a bitch who screwed every dog on the block…
And how come we don’t see much of the dog anymore, anyway? I think everyone in the group has been bashed in the head too many times to remember to take care of the dog.
Oh yes, and btw . . .
Personally, I think JJ Abrams has daddy issues, and that’s why EVERYONE on the show has a shitty (if not evil and homocidal) father. Instead of just paying for some good therapy, he’s working out his issues via the characters on the show.
Yep, the whole Jacob scene was a bit far-fetched.
Talking furniture, haunted cabin… now who would have ever guessed that?
Ben has some serious bunny, mommie, daddie and dolly issues he needs to outgrow?
Looking at that can of gas that took out the whole island – if Hurley ever lets a big fart rip, it will nuke the island…
It appears that young Benny (I see dead people) stumbled upon Nick Nolte’s cabin retreat for draft-dodging hippies. Well, hippies with machine guns and mustard gas.
If you don’t know where to take your show, introduce the ghosts!!! Lost has transformed from a mystery to a ghost story..yup this definitely was my last episode of lost…
suuuure it is….
well I’ve decided that i wouldn’t watch anymore of this but I know I will be on the couch on Wednesday next week with ABC back on…can you blame me? after all I’ve spent nearly three years on the show
No, of course not. WE ALL have too much invested to give up now. I am addicted too. Perhaps we can build a class action lawsuit for our time “LOST”
LOL now theres a thought…
Before commenting on the episode I have an admission to make: The scene in which young Ben (aka Harry Potter) walks in on his dad Roger passed out hammered on the couch surrounded by empty beer cans was very similar to the view one would have had of me in my living room watching the show. By the end of it, I looked more like the dead Goodspell guy on the Dharma park bench.
That being said, I agree that the show’s descent into (intentional?) camp constitutes definite progress. There were several comical moments, including young Harry Potter and his dick dad debarking the submarine to be welcomed by hula dancers (the only thing missing was Tattoo shouting “BOSS! DEE SUB! DEE SUB!”) It was also funny when they were in the orientation room and Roger is told that he will be the island’s janitor. The video playing on the monitor reminded me of waiting in line for the Jaws ride at Universal Stuidos (or countless other rides) and being bombarded with the same corny video loop incessantly as I queued through the hour long line. And the Other dude (Richard I think) looks just like Adam Ant! Eye shadow and all! Or maybe the guy from the Human League. I’m talking about the guy who looked exactly the same 25 years ago (when he met Harry Potter) as he does now.
The obvious high point of hilarity was the scene with Old Harry Potter talking to an invisible man in a chair. I give the actors credit for not bursting into laughter during that scene. It was a lot like the episode of “The Brady Bunch” in which Greg rigs up a fake ghost on the clothes line and fools Bobby and Oliver — who in turn convince Buzz Aldrin or some other famous astronaut to come investigate.
I should have known what was coming at the beginning when Harry Potter announces it’s his birthday (approximately December 25 by my reckoning) and then we cut to a scene of mommy giving birth to him 50 feet from the highway — with a visible road sign announcing that Portland (presumably Oregon) is nearby. I live in the Northwest and the weather is never like that in December — but shooting a program in Hawaii has limitations — may as well make a joke out of it!
It is fitting that the definitive mystery of Lost was revealed in this episode: “HELP ME!” Clearly, Jacob represents the Lost audience desperately pleading for a way to be rescued from the show.
Tommy writes: “It is fitting that the definitive mystery of Lost was revealed in this episode: “HELP ME!” Clearly, Jacob represents the Lost audience desperately pleading for a way to be rescued from the show. ”
Indeed Tommy. In fact when the faint shadow of a figure appeared on the chair, I thought I saw myself sitting there. A truly chilling moment.
“It is fitting that the definitive mystery of Lost was revealed in this episode: “HELP ME!” Clearly, Jacob represents the Lost audience desperately pleading for a way to be rescued from the show. ”
Hahahaha!!!!!
You are sooo right about that!
I laughed out when I saw Ben “grown up” and everyone else looking the same. He was oldest young man on earth. And if we hear that no one ages on the island, then why would a kid grow up? And the original inhabitants of the island??? Did they come from “Mutiny on the Bounty”??? “Let’s see now,” the writers are thinking, “what don’t we have yet? Oh, yes, an invisible man!”
And, again, when do we get to see Sayid kill someone? I want him to kill Juliet, but I’ll gladly watch him tie Ben to a tree somewhere and burn him alive. Maybe down on the beach, huh? Sayid can tie Ben to a palm tree in the middle of the camp and they can roast sea-marshmellows on Ben’s feet as they cook. Can next week’s finale end that way? Please? P.S. Cook Juliet, too, over a slow spit, roast her for Hurley. You know he’s hungry! AND MAKE THAT IDIOT JACK KISS HER LYING A** GOODBYE.
Yeah, Ben’s whole “coming of age” scene made me piss my pants. I was like, um the Dad is WAY too young and the Son is WAY too old.
Memo to Lost producers: When someone is playing a father, have them be OLDER than the person playing the son.
I actually thought it was ‘ok’ (with all the necessary qualifiers!).
hokey? a bit. but generally I enjoyed it…until (and here is my primary criticism of this episode and the entire series)…
when sawyer, sayid, et al FINALLY take a stand and we’re going to have a “gotcha” moment as they confront juliet and jack, the writers pull a big *SIKE!* by having juliet and jack confess to the taping. worse, she apparently confessed immediately after we first learned about her still being a traitor. so…for the past several episodes, WE thought she was dangerous, but jack already knew different.
to me that’s a sloppy,lazy, and unnecessary misdirection. it’s as if they intentionally create some [potential] tension, then let it fizzle out with one line of dialogue. it was just such a long way to go just to have the Lostaways discover the Other’s plan to raid the camp.
I think some of the other comments are accurate even if, like mine, they are a bit nitpicky. none the less, I enjoyed the episode. here’s a few intriguing, even if minor, points…
- ben’s crew didn’t stop locke from pummeling patchy, why?
- at least some of ben’s crew are the island’s “original” inhabitants (aka the hostiles) AND they may or may not age (cue greg brady’s spooky ghost whistle)
- ben is totally insane…probably…maybe…it makes him scarier if he is a norman bates type (i fully expected a skeleton to be sitting in that chair)
They failed to demonstrate what motivates Jack’s unyielding loyalty to Lil’ Miss Botox Clownsmiles. They failed to persuade viewers why the undisputed leader of the survivors faction (Jack) is now in league with Juliet/Ben. They have failed to demonstrate why the doublecrossed survivors fail to pummel him for his treachery, but instead allow him to make demands and in effect, lead.
always the contrarian…
they fail[ed] to do many things.
i was half expecting sawyer to give Jack a nice punch square on the nose when he was being his own pretentious self “I said where did you find the tape?”.
that might spice it up…they could use a little pro wrestling vibe on the show.
Here’s my take on the episode.
Major Theme: Loved Locke pounding Patchy and his snide remarks to Ben. He was clearly in control and I enjoyed that – up to the cabin scene when he gets freaked out and runs out like a girl. Can’t friggin’ BELIEVE he turns his back on the psycho-ben at the grave. If he dies, I’m done. (something for Laurent to root for)
Minor Theme: As usual, we have the testosterone boys (Sayid and Sawyer) manning up only to have their nads cut off by Wuss Boy and Dr. Botox. It seems Sayid’s main line is “What are you talking about?” with an arabic accent. I kinda laughed when they gave Claire one meaningless line just to actually have her present in the show. How much did she make for that 2 seconds on camera?
Flashbacks: Really wierd. Loved the misdirect at the “birth” as to where they were. Intrigued a bit by others/hostiles/whatevers that don’t seem to age. Maybe the smoke monster is a shape shifter or something.
More Questions besides the obvious Dharma crap and who is Jacob:
- what the heck was they continuous pile of gray ash that Ben stepped over and Locke touched?
- Who is Annie? (do I even care?)
I have a headache….
Yep, more of the same. At first, I liked it and I predicted that Locke would die (I had said Kate but that they probably wouldn’t kill her and if so Locke was gone). Note he was still breathing at the end, he wasn’t dead yet, so if he comes back, don’t everyone get in a tizzy.
Again, what did we learn? Nothing, as usual. About the aging thing, if the guy appeared not to age, then why did his (Ben’s) dad age? Jacob was briefly visible (I have a DVR and frame by frame went through, there was someone there, old guy with long hair). I thought Ben said they were the good guys, but they killed off a bunch of harmony seeking hippies, how’s that good?
So Roger Work Man was Ben’s daddy, at least Ben had the balls to kill his dad. The one good thing was they didn’t claim next week’s episode a must see, maybe they’ve been reading this board. Does look to be promising, though.
“What’s that Jacob? Lost still sucks? I know, but…I can’t hear you with all this moaning and groaning! Ok, ok, it still sucks. But we just suckered them into watching another episode.”
“Note he was still breathing at the end, he wasn’t dead yet, so if he comes back, don’t everyone get in a tizzy.”
I am holding out hope that Locke is either going to use his “super healing power” or that the Others will come and get him. They seem to respect him for some reason. I really can’t believe the writers would kill off the best if not one of the best characters on the show. I am still bummed about it.
I think this was the whole point of pounding that tid bit of the island’s curative properties into our heads, Locke will not die. Regardless of how much of a pussy he has been lately, he is still one of the central characters in the show, and theres no way they’ll cut him loose.
Locke did not look like a pussy in this one, with the one exception being he ran out of the cabin. He beat the crap out of Mikhail, who is the 815′ers favorite punching bag. He made Ben look like a bitch in front of all the Others (who seemed to watch very intently), that has to count for something. I hope he isn’t dead.
No doubt, he looked real tough laying in that hole twitching & bleeding to death cause he was dumb enough to turn his back on Ben.
No way he’s dead. The writers aren’t THAT stupid…well, I’m guessing anyway.
I think his falling into the pit where all the dharma hippies’ corpses were thrown has a significance…i believe he really is dead…but hey if he is alive it’ll be interesting he becomes crippled again
….
If you head to the spoilers site, it will tell you who will die. If you want to know. I think in a preview, Locke was seen in the future episodes, so he obviously survived, it’s just a mystery as to how. Also, Locke has been paralyzed, had the blast door crush his leg, and now shot, I just don’t think he can be killed.
This episode had a Craptitude rating of 4 out of 10.
The flashbacks were pretty informative. You know that Ben is the last of these freaky scientists who love Fantasy Island. Daddy was a dick (whose dad wasn’t in this show?” Ben betrayed the people in his group to the hostiles (the others?).
The invisible man scene was pretty hilarious, and I was actually waiting for it, thinking “we are learning WAY too much in this episode to actually meet Jacob; he’s going to be a magic turtle or some 10000 year old pirate.”
Major questions still remain:
who are the others, what do they want, why do they want who they want, who is Jacob and what does he want, why are their ghosts on the Island, why does the island heal people, what the hell are the magnets in the hatch for, why did it blow up, why is the island invisible, etc.
Since they will never ever be able to tie any of this up, just look for big explosions next week, and Ben will get captured again by the Lostaways (or some other eeeeeeeevil person will get captured) and the promise of answers will be dangled in front of you like a cheeseburger in front of Hurley.
Well, I’m going to say it – I really enjoyed the episode. At the half-way point, while revelling in Locke’s newly-rediscovered bad-assery, I wondered aloud where the writers of this epi had been all season.
Sure, there were some odd bits. I don’t think any episode dating all the way back to season one was perfect. But overall I thought it was pretty strong. Reasons why?
1. We didn’t have to see Hurley, if memory serves me, at all. Or at least very little. A blessed relief.
2. Locke got to pound the piss out of someone.
3. Sayid’s beer belly seems to be shrinking again (nothing to do with the relative merits of the show, I realize, but gazing at him lustfully was part of the fun for me, and chubby Sayid just wasn’t doing it for me.
I am actually looking forward to the remaining episodes. This is a new sensation for me… it’s just sad we all had to suffer so much to get to this point.
Firstly, let me start off by saying how completely disappointed I am with last night’s episode. I’d given up on Lost about 4 episodes into season 2 (still watching occasionally, but not expecting anything shattering), but was given new hope by last weeks episode. Although it came about a season and a half too late I thought it was one of the strongest episodes since that great first season (excluding the crappy finale) and for the first time since early in season 2 was actually looking forward to an episode.
Man, by the time 11:00pm rolled around I was thouroughly pissed.
Every Lost defender will tell you how much was revealed; Ben’s origin, a further and more revealing look into Dharma, the “war” between the hippies and the hostiles and its outcome, a supernatural island overlord…etc etc etc.
However, I say, BULLSHIT! Sure, every season the writers reveal something. Unfortunately, whatever they reveal is of little relevance and way down on the list of what’s important. Meanwhile, past plot lines (anyone even remember the amount of time spent on Walt’s seeming prescience) vanish quicker than a cast member pulled caught DUI.
I don’t know, perhaps if last night’s episode was the 3rd of the season, I’d have thought differently. But come on! There’s 3 episodes left and this is the best the writers can give us after a lackluster season?
Fuck You Lost!
Does anyone think there is a reason that Ben killed his own father and then required it of Locke? Is there some right of passage there for the island. And why did Ben need to be patient? Why couldn’t he kill him right away?
Overall I enjoyed the show, but did miss a few scenes thanks to my daughter continually getting out of bed. I actually missed the very end, but Mr. Meister filled me in. Thanks JT for the link to see Jacob or whatever /whoever that was in the chair. Pretty freaky stuff happening…
Sorry, I forgot to sign Mrs. Meister to the above comment. I do reference Mr. Meister, so it should be obvious, but just in case…I didn’t want to confuse anyone.
That’s very cute- the whole Mrs. Meister thing. I’m actually not being a smart ass, the couple that bashes Lost together stays together, heh.
Mrs.Meister
P.S.
Since there’s sooooo much nonsensical lunacy it’s hard to pinpoint ANYTHING (hmmmm…maybe the show is a metaphor for the Bush presidency), I completely forgot to mention one thing that irked me beyond all belief, which once and for all should prove beyond any doubt that Lost is FAR FROM INTELLECTUAL…
Ok…so the “Hostiles” poison the Dharmas. Then, they slllooowwwwllly remove their gas masks and sssllllooooowwwwlllyyyy breathe in.
People, I don’t know about you, but if I was around a gas powerful enough to wipe out an entire village of hopheads (outdoors no less), I’d wait long enough that when I finally did take off my gasmask it wouldn’t have to be all cautious like that.
Awful, melodramatic writing.
In their defense, the fog of the chemical was gone, and anyone who’s worn a gas mask will tell you that when you take it off, it’s just instinct (untrustworthiness I guess) of the gas being gone. I’ve endured the tear gas chamber 3 times, and it was the same way each time.
Actually, if you recall the seen with Ben killing his old man in the mystery machine (sans those pesky kids) the gas was invisible. Hence, no smoke (fog).
Also, you’d think they’d have some type of instrument to detect air quality, and avoid “gee, I hope it’s ok to breathe” moment.
Sorry, thought I saw smoke when he pulled the canister open. That is also true, we wear M-9 tape which detects chemicals in the air, and use a tester to determine all safe. Plus, once a chemical is dispensed, esp. outdoors, it doesn’t take long for it to dissipate. Even so, when I’ve been given the all clear (gulf war 1 vet), you’re hesitant to take it off and breathe.
Cautious hope turns to bitter disappointment. I gotta disagree with you Hannah. I categorally hated this one. BTW, JT, are we kewl?
When oh when will I learn to stop expecting this show to deliver? This epi was a particularly stinging slap in the face because I thought it actually had some promise. But how to explain the dismal turn of things: Locke’s inexplicable willingness to be lead into a death trap, the anticlimactic nature of Sawyer’s return to the camp with the “tape”, the focus on Ben’s past and the confusing proposition that some people on the island apparently do not age past 40(?) while others succumb to bad haircuts. Where are they going with this? Who are these hostiles? Did Ben truly see his mom? How was Ben groomed and manipulated into killing his people? Frankly, who gives a f&%$# anymore. This time, they did it. They have irredeemably damaged the story and ruined any hope of a coherent resolution (yes, I actually thought this was still possible before last night’s epi). And Ben… Ben is the one character for whom they should have dispensed with flashbacks because whatever mystique he still held has now complete evaporated. So after all of the speculation and mystery, after all the hang-wringing and mixed messages, it turns out that Ben is nothing but a frightened little nerd whose daddy was a loser and a drunk. Jeez, what a let-down and here I was hoping that he might be someone interesting like oh, I don’t know… Lucifer or something. And the whole poltergeist angle with “Jacob the Invisible” did little to redeem the story. Quite the contrary it was THE low point in the season. Lower than the ping-pong tournament. Lower than introducing and killing off Nikki and Paulo in the same episode. “Please God. No. Please no…”, I whimpered, rocking back and forth on the couch as I sat watching despite myself. This show has been, for me anyhow, an endless cycle of rekindled interest and dashed hopes. Once more, after three half-descent episodes, I got suckered into anticipating this week’s episode to see “what would happen next” and I got had. Putting aside the preposterously hilarious 70’s wigs, the epi didn’t start too badly. But just when Locke finally gets his groove back (the Patchy beat-down was a sweet piece of fruit, dude), he gets shot in the gut after sheepishly following Ben to a mass grave?! Then, Juliet confesses to the kidnapping plot, hence completely deflating any hope of a much anticipated ass-whooping. Come on! As for Jack, he is more contemptible than ever. Why can’t he get shot in the gut? Nobody likes him no-moh gosh naggit! Complete and utter rubbish… so that once again, I feel compelled to proclaim: Lost sucks donkey cocks.
“Ben is nothing but a frightened little nerd whose daddy was a loser and a drunk.” Haha! That was an awesome line. I laughed out loud at work! Thanks for this post, it was hilariously true! I just can’t stop watching though, no matter how much it sucks. I have to know! I NEED to know. I figure in the end, an alien mother ship will beam up the “hostiles” and they will go back to Alpha Centauri 6 or someplace, or Hurley will wake up in a bender from overeating Twinkies and will have dreamed the whole thing. I admit it, I am addicted and cannot stop, even if Locke is dead (sorry Laurent). I pray each week for Jack or Kate or Botox to die, but it never happens. I am going to rock back and forth on the couch now….
No, motherfucker! I’m going to reach through the entire internet and KILL YOU! That episode ROCKED! Kidding. It was good. Not great, but good, with some excellent twists, I thought. Definitely one of the most critically divisive episodes that I’ve seen, across the boards.
Before I talk about the eppy, I just wanted to get this one bit out of the way. Lookit this: last week, The Brig was an episode that many people — even most viewers here on this site — seemed to enjoy. But also notice that really no questions were answered, save for the Anthony Cooper/Sawyer issue. However, in this episode, a bunch of questions were answered. And people hated it. In season one, very few questions were answered, and people loved it. In season two, some answers were given. People hated it. Rinse and repeat. People seem to really love the episodes that don’t ANSWER our questions, but once the questions start getting answered, people get pissed because they don’t like the answers.
Okay. Anyway. The episode didn’t exactly rock, and I actually was a little bit disappointed and let down. I know you’re all shocked to see me type that, but yes, I was. I didn’t hate it at the levels you guys do, as I still dug it, but I expected a little bit more.
That being said — seeing as how I watch the show for its entertainment value and try not to make assumptions about the plot based on an episode that clearly had some gaps in it, storywise — it was okay. The Locke beatdown, yes, it ruled in about thirty different ways. The entire sequence back with the other Losties? Whatever. I mean, the episode was mostly about Ben and the Losties were barely featured, but most of the vitriol I’m reading about on the Net is about the actual Losties’ behavior. They were in the episode for approximately 3 minutes, yet people are still sniping at ‘em.
One thing I disagree with is the Juliet hatred, like I’ve said before. Just because people dislike a character (or the actress, as appears to be the case) doesn’t mean people should start hating an episode because they did something that could be construed as noble. And Jack spoke like TWO LINES OF DIALOGUE, guys. Come on.
As for the empty chair — I posted this on the other thread, but I’ll say it again, there was someone sitting in the chair. You only see him for a split-second. Seeing as how we’re dealing with smoke monsters and all that shit, the fact that there’s a dude who only certain people (chosen ones, I guess) can see is fine with me. Sorry if it’s not with you guys, but I really think you’re reaching — just a tad — on that one. Again, we’ll agree to disagree. That’s fine.
Richard not aging? Not really that horrible a plot twist, considering the island they’re on (which by the way we STILL know nothing about, so I’m unsure why people are so shocked that he mysteriously isn’t aging. IT IS A MYSTICAL ISLAND WITH POWERS, dudes and dudettes. It has been well-established that the island, as an entity, has powers. Come on!
In defense of Locke falling into his deathtrap, he’s not a telepath. I didn’t see the death trap coming — and seeing how Ben supposedly DID lead him to Jacob (I guess), Locke might have stupidly trusted him. People make mistakes all the time — are we to assume now that Locke is a deity who does everything perfectly?
Anyway, I agree with a few of the complaints here, but still am under the impression that some of you dudes are sitting down expecting to hate the episode before the title sequence even rolls. Gotta stop doing that. Seriously.
Peace out, my friendly beotches!
I can only speak for myself, I’m still a fan of this show, and never sit down with the intent of dogging an episode before it starts, or expecting to hate it before i start watching it. I always start watching it with enthusiasm and hope, ok this is the episode that will be the payoff for watching it religiously for the past 3 years. But now i’ve gotten desensitized to the crap they feed me episode after episode, and sadly, even if they throw in a great episode here and there, that overwhelming taste of shit left on my palate from the previous seasons won’t allow me to see the full brilliance of the episode. Too bad for me, I’ll just leave it up to you guys to point out the seldom great episodes
In my weeks of lurking I’ve not often agreed with you, JT – but on this one I do. And I’m skeptical when I sit down to watch… I’m expecting to not like it… so I was pleasantly surprised last night when I did.
I’m starting to say things like “last night’s episode was good” rather than “wow, Lost is a great show” – but I still enjoy it for an hour a week again, and it’s certainly more entertaining than a lot of the dreck on network TV right now. You’ve made the point many times that it’s entertainment, not high art – and I have to agree with you.
Now I need to go drink a martini, or perhaps some Dharma issue beer.
“But I still enjoy it for an hour a week again, and it’s certainly more entertaining than a lot of the dreck on network TV right now.”
Yep — exactly. Sure, the writers or producers or whoever aren’t perfect, and I’d be the last person to say that they’ve never screwed up a plot element of the show. But you’ve got to give them at least a little credit for actively trying to challenge the viewer and find new ways to entertain the audience without resorting to ripping crap from the headlines (Hi, Law and Order!) or having medical practitioners bang everyone in site (Hey! Grey’s Anatomy!) or showing lame reality programming involving crappy karaoke singers (Yo! American Idol!)
I mean, shit, the show is far from perfect. I know that. But it does have some deep, scholarly components to it (I’m personally a fan of the references to famous philosophers) and it’s miles above the drivel that actually *does* draw millions of viewers.
I’m starting to sound like one of those “fanboys” that people still will not stop talking about, and because I hate that word more than pretty much any other word, I’ll stop now. But you get my drift, I hope.
Hey, I like American Idol… Go Jordan!!!
Mrs.Meister
I just can’t believe it, dude. You never cease to amaze me. You actually like the episode. Wow. I will say that I have new-found respect for the fact that you are able to give credit when you feel it’s warranted. Re your comment: “but still am under the impression that some of you dudes are sitting down expecting to hate the episode before the title sequence even rolls. Gotta stop doing that. Seriously.” — Not sure if you included me in that category but my track record speaks for itself. If anything I should approach each episode with less optimism.
Nah, didn’t mean you, my poultryesque friend — in fact, I’m fairly certain that the majority of the regulars sit down with an open mind, and yours appears to be one of the *more* open minds, and you’ve certainly given credit where you’ve believed credit is due (which I also respect). Shit, I even believe that TYLER, of all people, sits down with an open mind, though I’d certainly like to hear from him if he’d care to respond.
There are, however, a *couple* regulars who I believe do have that “It’s really gonna suck! Let’s see how much!” mindset, and no, believe it or not, I’m not referring to Nico. But that’s their business. I’m not here to convince anyone of anything, nor would I delude myself into thinking that my opinion on a message board could sway anyone back to liking the show.
It’d be nice if everyone agreed with me, but I know that won’t happen. Which is cool, ’cause I kind of like being the odd one out.
I sit down every Wednesday with an open mind believe it or not. Which is why in every initial post of mine I DO include things I liked about the episode (even this week, which REALLY sucked imho). I will admit that I am at the point where it would take a really great run of episodes to change my general perception of the show. Still, hope is alive…
Turkey, just one week ago you couldn’t set your praises any higher for a ‘great episode’, and now one short week later you’re back on the bandwagon with the rest of us who see the show for what it is. I’m just happy that my quote about last week’s episode “slap in the face” stuck with you, and you decided to use it this week, I’m just glad we finally agree
I stand by my previous posts and would like to point out that you are misquoting me. First of all, I would never use such a pedestrian turn of phrase and more to the point, I would never have said that because none of the episodes have been “great” this season. I am nothing if not careful and deliberate about the language that I use. For the record, this is what I said about last’s week’s episode:
“I agree with LMeister and JT that this was actually a pretty good episode and that people appear to be going out of their way to find fault. That said, we must remain true to the spirit of this site. I think that it is an exaggeration to say that the acting was great and I do not agree with JT that we are holding the writers to an impossibly high standard by requiring that the characters at least have recognizable “personalities” and plausible (within the context of the show) patterns of behavior. Now about this last epi: I found it thoroughly entertaining. Everyone has got to admit that the last three episodes have been palatable. ” END QUOTE
My praise is always balanced with critical observations and my criticisms are always mitigated by pointing out the positive elements in a show. I have in fact, never gotten off the “Why Lost Sucks” bandwaggon But what makes this site interesting or more accurately, what makes the posts compelling is the balanced and astute opinion of often conflicted former fans of Lost. On the whole and for the record, I have been deeply disappointed by this show while at the same time feeling a compulsion to watch every week. If in my opinion praise is to be lavished, I will lavish praise. If a thing blows, I will tell it like it is. That is the difference between a lemming and a free thinker. Which one are you? Being the opposite of a fanboy is just as contemptable isn’t it? I like to think that I am hovering somewhere in the middle.
I’ve always been pretty clear on your position Turk. I just think it was an “I told ya’ so” moment for Jerome since he wasn’t buying the whole return to greatness thing (not that you were either really, but some folks around here seemed to be in that frame of mind- I mean even BigJim gave the last episode a good review).
My mistake, and when you said.. “I have been deeply disappointed by this show while at the same time feeling a compulsion to watch every week”… I couldn’t sum up how I feel any better
“I like to think that I am hovering somewhere in the middle.”
I’d like to think that’s where we all stand, though I seem to be hovering more toward the one side than you guys are.
And yeah — most of the opinions here are well-thought-out and astute. Some of them blow, though. You’ve got to admit that too. For every diehard fan who simply can’t see anything wrong with Lost, there’s someone who will hate the show no matter what. Which is unfortunate.
“When oh when will I learn to stop expecting this show to deliver? ”
problem identified…stop expecting steak when you slaughter a pig, dude.
As of last night, LOST has TOTALLY jumped the shark. How can even the most loyal, dedicated Fuselage fanboy say otherwise? The evil Ben, the sinister chessmaster, bane of our hapless disaster survivors, is finally revealed as a pathetic nerd whose daddy never remembered his birthday. Wow, what a great reason to slaughter your entire community! I knew many guys with the same sort of domestic situation who managed to not become mass-murderers. And what about Ben’s little girlfriend? Did he gas her as well? Will we ever see her again? Will we ever care? As usual, too many loose threads that will forevermore remain untied.
The ep was showing much promise early on. We loved how Locke smirkily deflected Benry’s obfuscations. And pounding Patchy was something someone should have done a long time ago. Then, abruptly, the entire episode (along with the entire series) came to a screeching end.
The actual shark-jumping moment of the LOST series was the empty chair in the cabin. It was at that moment that I realized once and for all that the show had reached the point of no return. After being such an intriguing, mystifying show that kept you on the edge of your seat, LOST has become a sad parody of itself. LOST has become like one of those eggs that have another egg inside, and another inside it, and another, ad infinitum. You never find the treasure inside, just another nested egg. And now, after smoke monsters, polar bears, and electromagnetic anomalies, we find an invisible man in an empty chair.
It turns out there was never anything more to know about Dharma. A bunch of well-funded hippies who were wiped out. That’s it. Big whoop. The mystique is gone. But with inept slight of hand, the producers limply attempt to transfer the mystique to “the Hostiles” and Richard — the New Ben — the ageless puppet master who pulled the strings from the beginning. Does the mysterious Jacob pull his strings or visa versa? Who’s running this crazy island? Does anyone care anymore? Now that the Others are on the way out, the producers will kill the next season feeding out tiny clues about the Hostiles each week to the viewers — all three of them.
If Locke is really dead, there’s no reason to continue watching this show. Locke was the only character who really wanted to understand the Island, and the viewers learned about it through him. Without Locke, the show loses any remaining hope of coherence. Oh sure, John will likely get “all better” and probably return from the bone pile next season as some of sort of messiah figure. Question is, will anyone be watching to see it?
The fourth paragraph of this post is outstanding (it’s all good actually, but that 4th para. is fabulous) & sums up all my fears about this show moving into the future. Richard as the “new” Ben, the Hostiles as the “new” Others- it’s shaping up to be a big circle jerk.
Thanks Nico, I also appreciate your observations on the steep decline of our once-favorite show.
I really wanted to see the cute little bunny rabbit explode.
I think everyone did, actually. I kept thinking of the rabbit from Monty Python, tearing people apart, and I wanted the fucker dead.
BTW, where exactly did Harry Potter get the combination to the fence?
Cmon, bro. That’s nitpicking. This goes back to the entire “no one on the island talks to each other” thing — not everything has to happen on-camera, yknow?
You know, they didn’t reveal anything. I think what’s going to happen the next couple episodes is they are going to wet the appetite for next season. Since they have an end date now, they can plan out the remaining series. But, it came after this season was wrapped (I think) so it’s too late to get anything from this season. So, that being said, last night’s episode revealed a couple interesting things.
1. Dharma installed the sound barriers to keep out the hostiles.
2. If Dharma was taken over, how did the Swan Station replacements get there? Has anyone forgot that Desmond was on the island 3 years prior, and the guy that taught Sayid how to torture (CIA?) was there for a few years before that? So how are these replacements getting there if Dharma brought them in via the area the hostiles now control?
3. How come Richard (apparently) didn’t age?
4. If the hostiles took over, and aren’t Dharma, and are the natives to the island, how did Dharma come across the island and what are the hostiles up to?
5. Why did they kill Locke? Did Terry Quinn get a DUI we don’t know about? Or was it for shock value?
There’s more but this is a start. I really despise the way they don’t answer any long standing questions, but just pile on a few more new ones in the hopes everyone will stay glued. This episode generated (for me at least) more questions than answers.
” If Dharma was taken over, how did the Swan Station replacements get there? Has anyone forgot that Desmond was on the island 3 years prior, and the guy that taught Sayid how to torture (CIA?) was there for a few years before that? So how are these replacements getting there if Dharma brought them in via the area the hostiles now control?”
I think this line of thought is a good point and I hadn’t thought of it. Like the writers, I totally forget about the past plot lines and don’t realize how the new plot lines should preclude them being able to happen. I’ll bet $50 that any answer that allows for this incongruity to be resolved won’t ever be offered…Any takers? JT? Marc? You guys seem to have more optimism than the rest of us.
It *is* a good point, and I simply can’t remember the end of season two well enough to address it.
I have heard they’re going to address the entire failsafe override issue later in the season, so maybe we just have to wait until the finale before they do.
[quote] Like the writers, I totally forget about the past plot lines and don’t realize how the new plot lines should preclude them being able to happen. [/quote]
This is something that I have been saying since about halfway through season 2: It is as if each episode of Lost is written by a completely different writer, isolater from the writers that are writing the other episodes. Each writer is only given the “bare” facts about the overall story to go on.
Therefore, this results in a lot of subplots that don’t go anywhere and things that happen in one episode have no bearing/impact on other episodes.
Hey Parrot. There’s only room enough for one bird on this site. Go peck around somewhere else. Gobble gobble. Just kidding of course. Poultry, birds and stutterers of all kinds are most welcome. But to respond to your post, I have always found the inconsistency difficult to understand as well. Even assuming that a group of people write for the show, you would expect to see a fairly high degree of logic and coherence. But so many things have been put aside or just left dangling. It’s really quite extraordinary for network television where executives tend to keep very tight control over the plot and characters. I would love to know what’s going on in the background.
Has there actually been anything ‘proven’ inconsistent? I know so much happens that is unexplained and we can’t figure out how it all fits together, but, have the writers screwed up to the point where we can say they have contradicted themselves … or is there hope that the puzzle will dazzle us once complete?
Mrs. Meister
Anybody else think the old hippie that flashed in the cabin for a second was an aged Locke?
Funny you should say that. I thought the exact same thing (it kind of looked like him).
Looked at some screen shots online, the profile does indeed resemble Locke quite a bit.
I thought the point right before Locke walked out, when Jacob said “help me”, I thought that was Jacob. Problem is, Jacob appeared to have a full head of hair. Maybe Jacob is Locke in another dimension.
In the screen captures I’ve seen he doesn’t have a full head of hair, it’s just what is there is bushy & untamed (& therefore covers some of the front of his head). If you recall in the flashbacks of Locke that were just a few years ago he wasn’t spear bald (totally bald), just REALLY thin in the front & thinning across the top. As a proud bald dude (who shaves his head much like Locke) I think I can speak with some authority on this subject.
You’re looking at screen caps. Uber fan.
Of course, I went frame by frame, so put the big L on my forehead. If you compare the shot of Locke as he was about to leave (extreme close up) to the shot of Jacob, there was some similarity. I don’t think it’s Locke, though, as it seems Ben is afraid of Jacob so he wouldn’t kill Locke because of that. Just a thought.
It’s the profile, the very round forehead & chin that made me think it looks like him.
Plus it seems inline with the regular “twist” the writers like to through in.
Anyone else think that Jacob could be Kris Kristofferson?
I’m agreeing with everybody who hated this episode. On last weeks message board, I told everyone not to get their hopes up about last nights episode, and I’m sorry.. but I was right. This episode was garbage. Yes, it started out great, and Locke beating down Patchy to finally stop procrastinating in getting some answers was awesome (i was actually cheering at this point), what he should have done was just beaten the shit out of Ben after the Jacob scene, or better yet, dragged the writers out from the magic box and given them a taste of what they sorely have coming to them. As far as how this show has been going, I wasn’t surprised by anything that happened in last nights episode, and as far as knowing of what became of the Dharma Initiative, does anybody else feel like that was a total copout answer? They’re just hippies who have a shitload of money and submarine and recruit people to work on an island to better the world… which doesn’t even matter in the slightest because they were all murdered by the others?!? what the hell is going on with this show? through the earlier episodes of the series, they put such a big emphasis on the dharma initiative and the freaky asian dude on the videos, but with one single episode, they wipe all that off the map. Still nothing of the true mystery of the island, or the natives is revealed, and i’ll say it again, don’t get your hopes up folks, they won’t reveal anything important to you until season 5 or 6, and when you finally do find out what you want to know, you won’t give a shit anymore.
I don’t give a shit right now, and if it’s going to be that far away, I give up now. Next week’s better be the “best episode ever” or this show will seriously lose a bunch of fans.
That sounds like hope, Preevyet….is that hope I here, veiled in an ultimatum? You’ll never be able to stop, you’re too emotionally invested, as am I. There is one great thing about lost sucking – we have this place to vent. At least if this crappy show keeps up for (choke) 48 more episodes we will have YEARS to share each other’s company.
At last, I may yet have a purpose in life.
As I’ve said before, it’s my heroin. But, as an entertainment source, it will remain. I will watch the rest of 3 and will be anxously awaiting 4, but if they hem and haw and do crap, I’ll be less inclined to tune in week by week.
I said it would lose a bunch of fans, but of course I’ll be watching along with the rest of you. Did you know if you invest 48 hours is equivalent to a 3 credit hour college course? Tag on the posting we do here (equate it to “study time”) and you could have passed a college course in the time we waste watching this show. Hmm.
Holy shit man… when they walked into the cabin & Ben started talking to the empty chair I almost threw my Dharma (TM) beer through the TV screen. I actually screamed out loud: “YOU’VE GOT TO BE FUCKIN’ KIDDIN’ ME!” and started to laugh hysterically. Even my fiancee who is a much bigger fan of the show than I these days, had to pick her jaw up off the floor. I don’t care if you saw a nanosecond flash of some old dude- it was for all intents and purposes an empty chair. WHAT A FUCKING COP OUT! Then the poltergeist shit where stuff started flying around the room… “Help me”? It really it turning into Scooby Doo! I’m not even going to bother ripping all the little shit (ok, just one thing: how come all the “natives” look pretty much caucasian with the exception of Richard & all speak perfect English? Maybe they’re the descendants of the crew of the Black Rock, “aarrrr maties… watch out for those meddling kids & their Great Dane”). I’m not even going to comment on the whole Jack/Juliet/Kate/Sawyer, blah, blah… they all suck no ifs ands ors or buts, we’ve already discerned this right? There’s no need to talk about how disappointing it is that the Dharma initiative where just a bunch of hippies. What’s the point of saying that it’s just sad that Ben is just a bully with daddy issues. Because Jacob is an invisible ghost man from the future who resides in a haunted cabin surrounded by some sort of magic circle (the powder Locke sees on the way there)! Jumping the shark isn’t harsh enough of a term for this episode. Humping the whale isn’t harsh enough either.
One sort of positive thing: I was actually sort of shocked when Ben shot Locke, didn’t see it coming. I think I was still wiping the tears of laughter out of my eyes after the whole invisible ghost Jacob scene. Of course, there’s no way he’s dead but is was still kind of shocking.
When the Ghost theme was introduced, after I regained control of my bladder from laughing so hard, I harkened back to stephanie’s (I believe it was her) Scooby Doo theory from last week.
It’s all starting to come together.
P-P-P-PIRATE G-G-G-GHOSTS ! ! !
1. “I don’t care if you saw a nanosecond flash of some old dude- it was for all intents and purposes an empty chair.” This was painful to have yet another major mystery not very well explained. If you go back on DVR and pause it, there was clearly something in that chair and it looked a ton like Locke.
2. “I’m not even going to comment on the whole Jack/Juliet/Kate/Sawyer, blah, blah…” They were complete non-factors in the whole episode, except for a tiny part and it didn’t give off the soap-opera love triangle vibe.
3. “The Dharma initiative were just a bunch of hippies.” Guessing the time period to be around the early 70’s, who exactly were you expecting? How this caused disappointment is a mystery unless you really were hoping Shaggy and Scooby were going to walk off that sub.
Just for the laughter alone, you spent your time in a more productive fashion than watching Mythbusters.
Yes, I was hoping for Shaggy & Scoob at that point. Yes, it was the best laugh I’ve had all week.
“You want answers?”
“I think I’m entitled”
“You want answers?”
“I want the truth!!”
We can’t handle the truth…Because it’s lame.
Several of my thoughts conveniently work as responses to some of JT’s comments.
1. after last weeks decent episode and the hype behind this one and knowing the season is winding down and the writer might ACTUALLY make something happen, for the first time in a LOOOONG while, I truly did sit down expecting a good episode.
2. Last week = no real answers and people thought it was not bad
This week = several answers and everyone is pissed
Why?
I came to this conclusion last night…I don’t want answers just to get answers. Yes, they are giving some answers but they in no way suggest some clever, original over arching design concept like they’ve been trying to convince us from day one that they have in their minds. For example, tying things together like: Ohhhh, the guy in the van that Hurley found was Ben’s dad…this show is so complex the way they tie up all the loose ends. Actually, that is (to steal Nico’s criticism) “soap opera level” writing. The “Ghost” thing was completely laughable and contrived. Complete soap opera fare.
Is it fair to say “answers aren’t enough at this point, they have to be GOOD answers”? Maybe not if I was watching a show that didn’t pretend to be something deeper, more original, more intelligent, more complex than any of the other primetime soaps.
But this show (and the writers themselves) has always tried to sell itself as above all that. If not, I wouldn’t have started watching in the first place. There’s a reason I don’t watch ER or Grey’s Anatomy or (fill in the blank). It’s garbage.
So, I’ve started to come to several conclusions about the show and my mindset while watching the show that will either A) finally allow me to stop watching or B) stop watching it with any expectation other than turning off my brain for an hour and enjoying a few minutes relaxing with my wife.
Unfortunately, it will likely be choice “B” because at this point, the show, through no effort of it’s own, has provided me with some intellectual stimulation but only because it caused me to end up here, debating how much it sucks! Ahhh, the bitter irony.
Then again maybe this lends credence to the theory that the overarching concept the writers had in mind was to create an socially interactive show where the life it takes on outside of the is the real concept and the characters in the show end up being the pawns of the “Gods” a.k.a. all of use who create theories or voice criticisms, etc.
Hmmmm….maybe the writers ARE brilliant…on second thought…Nahhh
Okay so we get that Norman Bates (whoops I meant Ben) likes betraying his people and talking to empty chairs, but how the hell does he go from traitor/janitor to leader of the hostiles? I mean I suppose this Jacob was actually the guy who used to wash the VW vans.
Also Juliet changes her mind in selling everyone out and shares the knowledge that Ben and co are going to invade with idiot boy Jack. What does Jack do with this vital info, oh yea sits on it til he comes up with a plan. The writers have a cry baby doctor who thinks he can come up with a plan to stop the others. Guess he forgot there is Desmond the soldier, Syiad the soldier/torturer, Sawyer a conman (survives by his wits apparently) and Jin who worked with some form of Chinese mafia. Anyone think maybe the wrong guy is in charge of strategy?
Once again the writers fail to deliver. After last week I had hoped they would at least build towards a decent finish but this ones gone into a serious nose dive.
Amen to this comment. When Jack-ass had the pompousness to declare “I was coming up with a plan” Man I screamed for Sayid or Sawyer to crush his face. I really, really hate Jack. All I want for the finale is him six feet under. THAT would ALMOST make up for all the bad writing.
Amen to that, brotha.
Bad writing eh? So, the addiction you feel has nothing to do with the writing?
Hey Katrina! I just saw your post! What are you doing on the dark side? Yeah, this show is like crack and I’ll never stop. Bad writing and all, I still must know what happens…..
Must start out by saying the level of disappointment shocks me over this episode. This one seemed to explain a lot more than most are giving it credit for. While the flashbacks of this season have been mostly pointless this season, we finally got one that meant something. Still, because this is WHY LOST SUCKS, the haters come out with the usual fare. Here is what we learned, like it or not.
1. Richard has apparently cured the aging process, at least for himself.
2. They did not start the Dharma “purge”, as Mikhail had claimed.
3. Ben was not born on the island.
4. Roger-Workman was Ben’s daddy. Not a decent father among any of the characters.
5. Juliet might not be on the Others side. Still, I don’t trust her, since she seems willing to throw everyone under the bus for her own good.
6. Naomi is NOT aligned with the Others, so her story so far seems accurate.
7. Ben’s mother died during childbirth.
8. Someone really did have a connection to Portland.
9. Ben is a ruthless murderer. No surprise, although he constantly claimed, “we aren’t killers.”
10. We now know where the rest of the Dharma folk ended up.
11. We know Locke was a genuine threat to Ben’s leadership on the island. Hard to tell if he is dead or not. Likely, only that no one has recovered from gun shot wounds, plus the spoiler that five people are going to die starting with the Brig.
12. Cooper still appears to be dead.
Maybe the scene with Jacob was a tad hokey. Something made that creepy cabin shake. Still, we already know that the end is way far off and we are stuck not getting the amount of answers that seemed a lot closer to coming out. This episode was entertaining for certain.
The only thing I really ripped on was the scene in the cabin & I think calling it “hokey” is being WAY to kind. It was beyond silly. Otherwise it’s the same soap opera-ish stuff we’ve all been complaing about for weeks. I will give it to you that it seems Cooper is indeed croaked. It’s just that none of the other things you name as “answers” really matter in the big picture; nor were most of them things we hadn’t already figured out already. As far as Richard not aging: are we sure that’s the idea & it’s not just bad make up & casting. I mean, we’ve already seen that Ben was the same age as his father when he killed him & Cooper sired Locke at the age of 7!
See, I don’t think so. And because I’m sure you’re wondering, heeeeeeeeeere’s why!
Remember when Ben said “You remember birthdays, doncha Richard?” I don’t think that was a throwaway line — I think birthdays don’t matter to them anymore, because they don’t age. Yeah, it’s speculation, but they wouldn’t have thrown a seemingly meaningless line like that in there for no reason, would they?
Actually, don’t answer that last question.
Hmmm… you’re probably right about that JT. I just wanted to point out how piss poor their casting choices are at times. I kept waiting for Ben’s dad to go: “…your mom died ’cause I was living too much in 1982″.
Which would cue an entrance from the famed Napoleon Dynamite!
I actually didn’t even realize that was the dude who played Uncle Rico until people started pointing it out to me.
He should have said “I can throw this Dharma Beer can over that mountain!”
Speaking of casting, who is the actress playing the school teacher? At some point she grabs a shot gun in expectation of an attack by the hostiles. Where have I seen her? It’s really bugging me.
I believe she plays opposite John Travolta & Christian Slater in Broken Arrow. I forget her name though.
Samantha Mathis
That’s right. Samantha Mathis. Thanks Nico. So this is what she’s been reduced to. An extra in a bad scene of a bad episode of Lost. How the mighty have fallen…
Good call, JT. That might explain the fact that Richard has held up remarkably well over the years. Even the little lines on show seem to hint at something larger.
Didn’t Team Darlton say that time is perhaps different on the island? It was in one of the podcasts. OK, yes, I was out of town, alone, and I listened to a podcast. Shoot me.
So they might be in a time warp of sorts.
The Richard thing is a tough call, but from little we have seen of him, he appears to have the most supernatural potential of any character. I am not so sure bad make up and casting can explain away the fact that Richard from the polyester era looks the same as present day Richard. When I think about soap-opera stuff, it is usually along the lines of who’s boning who, who loves who, etc, and we got a break from that this week. The casting of having a father who is only 5-10 years older than their son in real-life ages is not very good casting. Uncle Rico’s make-up job looked crazy bad in HD.
I don’t remember what Mikhail said exactly but it appears they DID start the Dharma purge. The “other’s” at this point appear to have gassed the Dharma folk quite effectively and wiped them out.
And yes, it appears the “suddenly susan” guy not aging could be pertinent but i’m not necessarily convinced yet that they weren’t just pulling a Monty Python and using the same actor to play multiple characters. The only thing better would have been if he had been in drag and using that fake falsetto voice. Or maybe the director’s total inability to work the numbers and make people look the appropriate age in flashbacks or relative to their fathers is at play here.
Apparently Nico and I were typing at the same time and his posted before me but we’re both on the same page that we’re not convinced the non-aging thing may not just be more bad make-up artistry.
Marc, I agree with Nico, the majority the the thing you claim we learned are so pointless to the big picture. All your reasons, except number 10, only focus on what was going on this season. The episode still basically ignored every aspect of the island mystery that hooked us on this show. Even being as much of a die hard supporter of this show as you are, can’t you admit that the writers are just stringing us along for a ride that we have no end in sight? or do you just not care to know about all the things that season one and two showed us about the island.. the numbers, the hatch, walt, the smoke monster, what was it Locke saw when he “looked into the eye of this island, and what he saw was beautiful”, why do dead people keep showing up and turning their backs and walking away from their sons?, and what they’ve done this season especially that has really pissed me off is that make a big deal of some issue, (juliet just to name one) and then completely write it off with some small one like bs explanation
Not much to say other than I am resigned to the fact that we aren’t going to find out about the smoke monster, the numbers, what Locke saw, etc until 2010. However, any small bit of info that we get between now and the end will eliminate many of the bogus theories that float around at the moment. Also, we pretty much know that the “dead” people that show up are another manifestation of the monster.
Marc, give me a break dude. To respond to your awesome list of mediocrity:
1. Conjecture that Richard cured anything. No idea that this is true.
2. Who cares?
3. Who cares again?
4. Wow, what an AMAZING revelation. This mystery of who the drunk dude in the van was is on my top 10 mystery list!
5. Juliette is a liar so nothing is revealed with any certainty
6. Naomi has spoken about 3 lines thus far – how on earth do we know who she is “aligned” with
7. Wow! A fact given in a show is now considered revealing a mystery. Please!
8. Ooooo Mysterious City of Portland. Next we will find out Naomi is from Toledo!
9. Someone on the island is a murderer? No friggin’ way. I will tell Sawyer, Kate, Charlie, etc etc.
10. Do we? I am betting this is in no way the full story.
11. After Ben is revealed as sniveling little geek, I would think the fact that anyone “follows” him is not on the level. This was probably a misdirect all along.
12. Cooper is dead, so is the show’s reputation.
Lmeister, this is pretty typical of the hater mindset. You are determined to say “fuck this show” no matter if you get the answers, you don’t get the answers, you don’t like the answers, etc. You can’t have it three ways, unless of course you just get off on hearing yourself bitch. The smallest of answers is much like a part of the puzzle leading up to the bigger unanswered questions remaining. But to simply dismiss what was revealed in Curtain as mediocrity, nothing or “who cares” is your own problem. It was important to know how the purge actually occurred. It was important to know if Ben was born on the island. Also, I never said Richard cured the aging process, but rather that he cured it for himself. Furthermore, assuming you have been paying attention to the show, Charlie is NOT a murderer, Kate & Sawyer are not on the same level as Ben in terms of murder. Sorry dude, but we now know with certainty that Juliet is in the game strictly for herself, and that is important.
Whatever Dude, keep clinging to your fanboy moronic optimism. Do you have Jack’s poster on your wall? Did you forget what site you are on? Take a look at the address bar, if you have.
I was hoping that they would use at least part of this episode to explain why Ben & co are so obsessed with babies, childbirth, pregnancy, etc. I guess his mom’s death could be a part of it, but why does the rest of the crew care so much about it? The whole baby sub plot is what I hate most about the show
I’m going to agree with you on that one. When they started talking about fertility experts & gave us Juliet’s sappy back story I felt like I was watching Lifetime TV for women.
It can’t be lifetime, Ben didn’t beat or rape her.
Mrs.Meister
The last time I checked, reproduction was not the exclusive domain of women. I’ve said it before, that whole fertility angle with its urine samples, ultrasounds and sperm counts is extremely distasteful. I just can’t bare to associate Hurley, the Hobbit, Patchy or Ben with an abnormally high sperm count. Gag. But alas, we have not seen the last of that plotline since it has not been “fully” resolved yet.
A coconut tree falling on Claire, Aaron a.k.a. “Turnip Head”, and Juliette would be a good start on resolving the baby plot line.
I think their interest in the babies is for procreation on the island. Assuming they aren’t already dead … if none of the women can bear children without dying, then they will be gone after this generation. Does that mean we can hold out hope for LOST TNG? Dare to dream.
Mrs. Meister
I agree with Nico, the majority the the thing you claim we learned are so pointless to the big picture. All your reasons, except number 10, only focus on what was going on this season. The episode still basically ignored every aspect of the island mystery that hooked us on this show. Being as much of a die hard supporter of this show as you are, can’t you admit that the writers are just stringing us along for a ride we that we have no end in sight? or do you just not care to know about all the things that season one and two showed us about the island.. the numbers, the hatch, walt, the smoke monster, what was it Locke saw when he “looked into the eye of this island, and what he saw was beautiful”, why do dead people keep showing up and turning their backs and walking away from their sons?, and what they’ve done this season especially that has really pissed me off is that make a big deal of some issue, (juliet just to name one) and then completely write it off with some small one like bs explanation
Sorry, this was supposed to be a reply to Marc’s comment above, and just so there is no misunderstanding, I will copy and paste it above where it belongs
Absolutely. As I said above, answers just for the sake of answers just isn’t good enough. Granted some of these answers are of a little higher order than that earth-shattering “What Does Jack’s Tatoo Mean?” fiasco, but they still are in no way suggesting an over-arching concept that the writers claim is there.
actually I was referring to your comment above about the answers just for the sake of answers, sorry i forgot to drop your name in the reference
Just trying to clarify your post — are you saying that the answers they gave weren’t good enough, weren’t enough, or didn’t answer the right questions?
in this episode, basically what i’m saying that the answers they gave weren’t good enough. We gotta admit, we were all really curious in earlier seasons when Locke and Echo found the Dharma orientation tapes, and they felt compelled to watch it twice. back then i thought to myself, ‘wow, thats freaky, i wonder what thats all about’. and the answer they gave to that… the hippies, etc, how they were all murdered, I just think it was a total cop out. I feel that what began as such an awesome mystery, was resolved with none of gusto it started with
I don’t understand at all why you consider it a cop out. It seems everyone here is so deeply offended that Dharma consisted of hippies. To that I say, who cares? Would it have been more interesting for it to be Area 51 inhabitants? A part of the mystery was clearly given to us. We were told in previous episodes (by Patchy) that the purge occurred because Dharma attacked the hostiles. However, based on what was SEEN in Curtain, that clearly did not happen. Unless we see a lot more info on future episodes, we have to work with the assumption that Dharma DID NOT provoke being attacked. While this does not solve the entire mystery of the history of Dharma, the Hostiles, the Others, it does provide a part of the puzzle. That needs to be acknowledged. Why all the disappointment? What exactly were you expecting, the whole story? That would be great but give it up, not coming until 2010. The Dharma angle is still an awesome mystery regardless.
Jerome and I are basically on about the same point here:
to clarify my comment above: The answers aren’t good enough AND don’t answer questions about anything important.
I’m sorry to keep harping on this but all along, the writers keep claiming they have a story line that is all-encompassing and ties everything (even if only in general) together. Further, those of us who question that are completely berated by the hardcore fans about how we just aren’t smart enough to get the complexity of the whole thing (I’m not saying you JT but you know what I mean).
Nothing about the answers that are being revealed suggest that the writers do have a plan or have ever had a plan. They seem to be creating plot threads make it impossible for previous plot threads to have happened the way they did.
Yep, as the preview for next week was rolling I looked at my fiancee & said something like: “anybody whose foolish enough to think they’ve been planning all this from the beginning must be smoking crack”.
I hear ya, Stick, and the rabid fans who insist that detractors of the show just don’t get it are elitist schmucks with superiority complexes who think that “getting” a show is akin to having the intelligence necessary to develop a neutron bomb or do quantum physics exercises in their heads. We just happen to live in a world where contrary opinions are usually met with hostility.
Honestly, though, I disagree with you on whether or not the writers have an overall plan and a plot that they’re building toward. I really think they do — the entire Jacob-is-a-phantom-entity-with-powers seems to mirror the concept that the island itself is an entity. Though that might be something of a reach, I can see it, though I might be a little too optimistic. Who knows? Time will tell.
As far as the questions that were answered in this episode, I can kind of relate — but I’m also guessing there were details the writers threw into tonight’s episode that everyone may have missed, myself included. And it kind of cracked the door open on what the Dharma Initiative is, informed us that there were *other* people on the island, and I gotta admit that I’m cool with that. Maybe I’m just easily pleased.
Personally, I just want to know what the goddamn smoke monster is.
I think the smoke monster is Jacob, and he is also all the hallucinations… Jack’s father, Kate’s horse, Echo’s brother etc. Trying to lure them away for something. Now why, I don’t have any guesses. And let’s not forget it pulling Locke down the hole. Perhaps, it is the ‘magic box’ . BTW, does anyone remember Walt’s weird animal power? Even before he was on the island. Remember how he was looking at the pic of the bird and then the bird crashed into the window. And when we first saw the polar bear on the island, he had the comic in his hand…or something like that.
Mrs. Meister
oh yah, i can’t even believe i forgot about the episode “what do jacks tatoos really mean”. without such horrible episodes like that strewn all over season 3 i would have never went to google and searched “lost sucks” and found my new drug of choice, whylostsucks.com
Stranger in a Strange Land was the worst episode of this season and the most disappointing.
That’s funny, that is EXACTLY how I found this site too. I wonder if there is some kind of mysterious connection…..
Like I said before, the biggest reason Why Losts Sucks is that all the big-picture mysteries won’t be answered until 2010. That to me was a devastating announcement. Yet, some of what you want to know can be explained to a degree. The dead people who keep showing up on the island are the smoke monster, which seems to have the ability to take the form of anyone. So, it’s safe to assume that Jack’s father really is dead, Yemi, Ben’s mother aren’t really there, etc. The hatches were all built by Dharma, so we have some understanding as to how they got there even if we don’t exactly know their precise purpose. Michael and Walt were supposed to come back during these current episodes but there were contractual issues. Still, the smaller mysteries of this season do tie in with some of the larger mysteries of the show. One of the biggest mysteries of all was the connection between Dharma and the Others and now we pretty much know.
So to you the fact that Ben used to be a Dharma guy & then recruited the rest of the Others for a still unkown purpose that somehow helps the Hostiles answers questions? I got confused just typing that statement…
The thing that was answered was the question being what was the connection between Dharma & the Others (or hostiles). We still don’t know all the mysteries as to what the Others are trying to accomplish.
Right, but the Others aren’t the same as the hostiles since Ben brought them there to work for the hostiles apparently. That’s my point- where are the rest of these so called natives (hostiles)?
We still don’t know exactly when the hostiles turned into the Others, or which members of the current Others go back to the old days with Richard. Tom certainly is old enough as is Goodwin. Of course, I guess age doesn’t matter since Ben managed to pass up Richard on the lead lap of the age race. I’m sure there will be more Dharma/early Ben flashbacks since it appears 815′ers backstories are mostly exhausted.
“Like I said before, the biggest reason Why Losts Sucks is that all the big-picture mysteries won’t be answered until 2010.”
I found this interview with Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse (who people seem to hate, for some reason, and who people also refer to as ‘Demon and Curse’, which is the gayest derogatory nickname I have ever seen) on Zap2it. Here’s one snippet that I found particularly telling, which you peeps may or may not disagree with. It’s below.
———————————————————————-
Cuse: I will say this, though: I wouldn’t want to give people the wrong impression that all of a sudden we’re just going to start answering questions willy-nilly. I think people who watch Lost break down into two categories. There are people who are hunting for answers and waiting for answers, and I think those people are bound to be frustrated almost under any circumstances. An even when we get to the endgame, the answers we give probably won’t be the ones they wanted.
I think the people who really enjoy Lost are those who just appreciate the journey and are along for the ride, and I think are less concerned about answers and more engaged by the characters and by — this is sort of the entertainment value of an ongoing story. I think for those fans, this new paradigm is going to be really exciting. We’re gonna be doing some things to kind of shake up the show, and I think those fans will be very happy. For people who instantly and immediately expect answers, I don’t think this paradigm changes things drastically. It does, however, give definition to how many more episodes they’re going to have to wait to get answers.
Any thoughts? Yes? No? Maybe?
I agreed until this season when the writing & therefore acting took a serious turn south (as in BAD). I already know & like (many of) the characters, now it’s time for them to actually DO something.
I can appreciate the whole song and dance about the rich life journey being more important than the destination. Still, I thought the journey was almost over. Everything I have read to this point indicated that Season 4 would be the end until the announcement this week. I hope the two assholes don’t keep changing their minds.
Ok Marc, after that statement I really like you a lot better now.
You know, the more I think about it, and given their statements, I think as long as the episodes are entertaining, I’ll watch. I guess I can give up the high hopes I had for the series, as it appears the producers are laying the groundwork for a disappointing finish. The only thing I really want to know (and something they’ve gotten away from) is what the hell do the numbers mean? For God’s sake, I’m a mathematician and I can’t figure it out, so it must be a code for something. If they tell me that before the season is over, I think I’ll still watch solely for the entertainment value.
Preev, I believe the Numbers were explained on The Lost Experience. You can probably find more if you search for “The Valenzetti Equation” on Wikipedia.
I call BS on that one. I shouldn’t have to watch a documentary on the show to understand what is going on in the show. If the numbers were no more important than to just simply explain them in “the lost experience” and not need to mention them ever again to advance the plot THEN DON’T MAKE IT THE CENTRAL FOCUS FOR MOST OF A WHOLE SEASON.
I don’t know, I didn’t watch the Lost experience. Maybe the numbers will come back into play but if the lost experience is the last time we ever hear about them then that is totally weak. sorry.
Hey, I agree with you. I didn’t participate in the Lost Experience either, so I’m not sure how much was divulged about the numbers et al. It would be incredibly lazy to explain a significant plot branch through a web-based alternate reality game, though, like you said.
I’m sure the numbers’ll come up again. I hope so, at least.
What Cuse says at the end… “An even when we get to the endgame, the answers we give probably won’t be the ones they wanted.” There it is… its their escaspe clause for taking the plot of this show to such a twisting, torrid roundabout manner, that they’ve just told us, ‘we can tell you whatever the hell we want to at this point, so deal with it.’ It also kind of proves that they started this show not really knowing how to end it.. atleast thats what i think
“It also kind of proves that they started this show not really knowing how to end it.. atleast thats what i think”
Not sure I see where you’re getting that from the interview. And I think it’s more of a commentary on something I’ve commented on before (and commented on in this very thread) — people liked the show more when there *were* no answers. And I’ll stand by that: the more answers that come, the more people get pissed off, because they have their own idea in their heads about how everything’s going to ultimately turn out.
I don’t think they are necessarily telling us we won’t like the answers, but rather trying to calm the murky water being stirred by Why Lost Sucks and perhaps others I’m unaware of. They’re trying to invalidate the site by saying we CAN’T be pleased no matter what. That is my take anyhow.
What a cop-out. Essentially, those members of the audience who expect coherence, plausibility and logic should look elsewhere. Further evidence of their lack of respect for people’s intelligence. Explains why much of the story feels like a creative writing exercise.
See, I read the interview different, I guess. The main point I was trying to get at was Cuse’s contention that there were two types of viewers — the ones who sit around waiting for answers, and the ones who sit there and enjoy the experience *while* they’re waiting for answers.
One line that I thought was especially telling: Cuse says that he thinks that a certain subset of Lost viewers “are bound to be frustrated almost under any circumstances” regardless of what answers they get. And I agree, because it follows what I’ve been saying all along — some people have their own ideas about what the answers should be, and when those peeps discover the actual answers within the confines of the show, they’re bound to be pissed.
There is, of course, another subset of people who contend that the answers are illogical and senseless. There might be some validity in that, sure, but I think we should wait until the end of the show (three years!) before making those assessments. I know. It’s a long time. But we might all think about the show differently after it’s wrapped up and we can think about the entire series as a whole.
Lest we forget that in season 1, Jack’s dad kept appearing. Maybe it’s a parental thing, if you’re parent was dead, you’ll see her on the island. I guess Locke (if he survives) will see his again soon.
One more thought (rather than an outright complaint): Who else besides Richard are island “natives”. Obviously, just being on the island alone doesn’t stop you from aging (or Ben would still be the Harry Potter kid). So where are the rest of the hostiles (the Others are folks Ben brought to the island, right?)? Plus, if just being on the island isn’t enough to stop you from aging, then what’s different about these so called “natives”?
If “others” is supposed to ONLY be people Ben brought to the island and not natives, if Mikhail claimed to have been part of starting the purge then maybe that suggests he is a native. Again, all of this would assume a deeper plan in the writing and carefully chosen dialogue.
I think what concerns me more is the fact that I just spent brain power theorizing about the plot and creating a post that is WAY too similar to something that could be found on a rabid fan site.
To quote Jacob: HELP ME!!!
Patchy can’t be a native because he served in the Russian military. Plus, wouldn’t all the natives have the same accent & speak the same language? Plus, doesn’t being Russian make him most definately NOT a native? Or does native not mean what we think it does? Either way it doesn’t explain why someone born on the island woud only age up to about 40ish & then stop; or do they only not age when actually ON the island & then only if they were actually born there. Which means Patchy could have actually been born on the island in the 20’s, left & lived in Russia where he served in Stalin’s army fighting against Hitler, picked up a Russian accent, then came back before he aged past 55 or so…
I think I just stroked out.
Maybe it’s supposed to just be like Braveheart where everybody had a different accent but everyone was supposed to be Scottish and we just weren’t supposed to notice. Or like in Robin Hood when Kevin Costner didn’t have a British accent even though Robin Hood was English.
Or actually, I like your explanation above. I can hear the whooshing sound and can see the flashback now.
It will turn out the Hitler is actually Patchy’s father (which would be in keeping with the emerging trend of everyone’s father was despicable)…Hitler can then make appearances on the island and even more questions can be raised…Remember, they DO have to keep this thing going until 2010 now. The fans sites will all be buzzing.
They’re all haoles!
I grew here you flew here!
Island power brah!
That is absolutely outstanding. You sound like you lived here at some point.
If I had a dollar for every bumper sticker I’ve seen here on Oahu that says something like that…
My wife won’t let me get the “Haole and Proud!” license plate frame lest my truck become the victim of some random violence.
I’ve surfed many places on our small orb, and localism is global. I think people forget that humans are a migrating species, and try as they might to twart it, but everyone comes from somewhere else and will continue to do so.
Okay i think there were no natives. I think the hostiles were originally dharmas who perfected a way to bring people back to life and then split off for some reason and then at the right time, they killed the rest of the dharmas and then re-tookover the facilities. They experiment with everyone who’s ever died on the island and bring them back, except the ones who suck like ana lucia. When the dead come back to life, they remain the same age at which they died. That’s why ben’s mom told him it wasn’t the right time yet to walk through the fence. I mean really who wants to be 12 forever? So ben dies and we just haven’t seen that part yet. He’s living forever like the rest of the others. That’s why others don’t mind killing one another so frequently and without thought and that’s why they just stand around when they see the shit being beaten out of one of em—-cause it just doesn’t matter. you know…who really gives a shit. i don’t remember everything that happened anymore and this probably doesn’t even make any sense but you know what? i don’t care.
oh yeah i was assuming ben’s mom’s body was brought to the island or something for burial who knows. we’ve only seen jack’s dad, ben’s mom, boone and shannon, and ecko’s bro right?
Don’t forget Kate’s horse.
No! that’s her sister. did you notice how they have the same teeth?
Actually that makes good sense & would explain why they can’t reproduce normally (life can’t come from death, all that mystical BS).
What if jacob is just some old guy who just really really wants to die and can’t? cause he’s already a zombie like the rest of em. i always said the worst torture would be to live forever. whoa what if the losties really did all die and they all got brought back to life and they just don’t know it?!?!?!
Couple things, first when Patchy came back and Ben said “I thought you were dead”, how did Ben know? And if they thought he was dead, why didn’t they go bury him? And if they saw him lying there, why didn’t they check to make sure? Maybe the losties mentioned they killed him, I don’t recall but still, you’d think they’d verify.
Also, I half expected Patchy to look into the camera when he replied “thankfully the fence was not set to lethal” or something like that. Kind of a “OK fans, here’s why I’m still alive.”
When the black lady was shot, Patchy shot her in the gut. I think she’s still alive, she said something like you know what you’ve got to do, or shoot me, or whatever.
Last, when Locke saw Patchy later, he appeared only slightly beat up, if someone pounded a normal person like that, they would have broke an orbital socket first of all, and more than likely would have swelled the eye shut. This also goes along with Locke’s hand healing miraculously fast. So, I think the island does have some magic healing powers. Unless of course you’ve gotten a DUI.
I wish the island would give charlie a nose job. i don’t see why it can’t do that since it can heal juliet’s wrinkles
Or give Kate some orthedontistry (sp?)…
Kate (Evangeline) was on Kimmel the other night and she finally had her tooth shaved down. She’s still got the beaver teeth, but not so bad now. Apparently the island will heal her teeth next season.
Charlie gives hope to the ugly people which constitute 90% of the population and 99% of the people posting here. So what of his nose? I can endure that more than I can Boone’s attempts at acting. Superficial people are responsible for Paris Hilton and Justin Timberfake. No thanks.
The funny thing is that ugly people truly despise their brethren. They’d much rather see a handsome actor where they can attribute success to good looks rather than talent and hard work. It makes it easier to justify their own mediocrity.
Yeah, I caught that one too, Preevyet. I thought to myself: so you found his body and left him there to rot in the sun?
Ben thought Patchy was dead for the simple reason that Locke told him that he killed him back when he gave Ben a late night visit during The Man from Tallahassee. They didn’t go bury him because he probably woke up after his foamathon sometime afterwards. I’m glad he’s not dead since he makes for another interesting bookend villain to with Ben. Lost has always been incredibly good at getting fringe actors who are not big names but have at least one very memorable performance in something (Mommie Dearest, The Stepfather, Wishmaster, Saw, Napoleon Dynamite, etc.)
This cannot be totally true, since:
1. Ben was trying to be saved by Jack’s operation
2. The others desperately tried to save the chick shot by Sun while raiding the boat.
3. They were going to execute Juliette for killing another other, or other another, or other other, whatever.
One thing I don’t get is why everyone seems to be so fired up about Patchy getting throttled again – haven’t we already seen that about 80 times? I recall that Jin and Sayid both administered royal butt kickings on him. I think even Kate slapped him around! Not to mention the sonic fence, frothing at the mouth episode. I hope that Rose comes back and gets her turn to bitch slap Patchy a few times.
Yes, he seems to be the island’s resident whipping boy.
Yet, it never gets old. The only thing I would like to see more is for the perma-smirking Juliet to get an ass-whipping. She must be doing a decent job of acting because I have come to detest her character on the show.
Particularly good crop of posts this week… Completely missed the Ben look-alike in the chair. My prediction is that Richard or Jacob will save Locke but who knows if that will happen in the next episode. And Tommy, you’ve gotta admit that it was pretty satisfying to see Locke head butt Patchy even if Ben is our preferred victim.
Yes, I will admit that it was satisfying to watch that. If Patchy is an indication of the competence of the military of the former Soviet Union, then I guess we know why they performed so dreadfully in Afghanistan. Although he is an excellent field medic.
I’m sure, if current history is our guide, a depiction of an American vet could hardly fare better. Perhaps this devout christian fundy would humiliate and brutalize the island inhabitants and suck dry the island’s resources while, ostensibly, searching for Hanso’s WMDs. I’ll take the Russian punching bag, at least he knows when he has LOST.
Watch wherefore thou treads, Laurent. I happen to be an officer in our fine military. Besides, if you want to poke fun at weak militaries, the French come to mind. Standard issue in the French Army is a .5mx.5m white cloth. They also learn how to say “I surrender” in 100 languages.
The reason they don’t like Patchy could be he’s really a Dharma guy they couldn’t kill because of his running the comm station.
Sorry, but the French (and others) take exception to the disparagement of the Soviet era military apparatus, who are in fact, despite what your jingoist propagandized history books inform you over there, the true liberators of Europe in WWII.
You’re right Laurent, the Soviets did do the yeoman’s work in fighting the Nazis. However, it wasn’t a choice they made — in fact, they signed a non-agression pact with the Germans which the Germans eventually decided to cast aside. The Soviets lost approximately 20 million people fighting back and eventually defeating the Nazis. However, the system that the Soviets set up in Eastern Europe was not much of an improvement. There was over 40 years of Soviet domination in the Eastern Bloc countries. Any attempt by those nations (Hungary in 56 and Czechoslovakia in 68 among others) to assert self-determination was brutally repressed. So yes, the Soviets were mostly responsible for defeating the Nazis, but was Stalin much better than Hitler?
I will agree that the Soviets created the eastern battle front which strained Hitler’s forces, but come on, it was the America/Canadian et al landing on D-Day that turned the war. The Germans didn’t follow rule #1 of war, never start a land war in Russia during the winter.
The Soviet era planes and pilots (the ones I know about, guess my service), were good but time and again, in real engagements, we’ve kicked the Soviet stuff’s butt. The MiGs and Su’s were blatant copies of US machinery, but the real key was the training. Had the US gone toe to toe with the USSR, it would have been tight, but I think in the end we would have kicked their butts. Their soldiers are all conscripts, and don’t really want to fight, we’re all volunteer and don’t want to fight, err I mean we like to kick butt! I think Clancy’s “Red Storm Rising” is infuriatingly accurate (but we won, in case you didn’t or won’t read it).
Another thing that Europeans often conveniently ignore is the supreme sacrifices Americans made in defeating the Japanese in the Pacific. At the time of Pearl Harbor, the Japanese had already conquered most of China, Korea, and South East Asia. If not for the Americans, the Japanese, whose military was roughly the equal to Germany, likey would have invaded the Eastern reaches of the Soviet Union (they had already easily defeated the Russians in the Russo-Japanese War). That would taken resources away from the Soviets in battling the Nazis. Stalingrad could have had a completely different outcome.
Damn all my typos, “likey” should be “likely” and the second to last sentence should read “That would HAVE taken resources . . .”
Back to the main point, it’s absurd to dismiss the entire Soviet era military when citing the war of Afghanistan, a war which the US (who armed and supported the Afghanis) drew the Soviets into fighting in the first place (an American war by proxy).
The US hasn’t won a war since WWII, but nobody would be so foolish as to dismiss the US armed forces by their failures in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, and their long list of covert losses in Columbia, Nicaragua, Iran, Honduras…
(or would they?)
-As far as conscripts, the US fighting force had a large number of conscripts… like over 10 million.
Laurent, congratulations on Sarcozy. I’m sure France will be a much better place now.
Mrs. Meister
No fears, France can never become the type of “better’ society that elects an election stealing, morally bankrupt, religious fundamental, war-mongering, empirialisric, corporate puppet, fascist, rights abusing, pollution loving, environment destroying, wealth hording, poor crushing, worker disrespecting, people kidnapping, enemy torturing, arms building, space militarizing, trade defeciting, middle class wrecking, social programs cutting, world alienating, innocent people bombing, soldier slaughtering, language bumbling, puppet and fraud of a leader.
Normally, it would be considered ironic the fact that the world welcomes the dawning of China as the future relief to all this, particularly since American voters can’t be entrusted to do so.
Wow Laurent, that reminded me of Chuck Robb’s blazing screed against Oliver North during the closing days of the 1994 Virginia senatorial election. The funny thing is that there is great doubt as to whether Bush was even “elected” in 2000. Even if Bush had won Florida (which is highly suspect in itself), Gore received more votes nationally. A quirk in our constituion called the Electoral College allows a candidate to become president with less votes than his opponent.
The electoral college isn’t a quirk. It is genius. Without the electoral college, elections would be determined purely by the cities. The electoral college allows a better representation of the entire nation.
Mrs. Meister
Instead of waxing eloquent like my wife, Mrs Meister (Happy Mother’s Day, honey). I will simply say this:
French socialist atheists Suck
American capitalist God-fearers Rule
Laurent, who was apparently hatched from a pod and thus has no mother, should thank the American military that he does not have to say “Ich bin ein Berliner”
-Mr. Christian, Republican, American Patriot, Lawrence
PS Kiss my American Ass Laurent
“No fears, France can never become the type of “better’ society that elects an election stealing, morally bankrupt, etc…”
With all respect to France’s assumed cultural superiority, France just elected Nicholas Sarkozy, a Polish immigrant to France who wants to stop immigration. The Front National probably voted for him in droves.
France definitely needs major reform, but my God, is Sarkozy what you really want?
He’s George Le Bush, or Vladamir de la Putin– at best. That’s the new president.
He’s going to rule like a despot and nonetheless probably not change very much. But expectations are so low for France, I’m sure when unemployment descends to a recent low of 10% that there will be parades of tanks down the Champs Elysee– don’t worry, they will be French tanks this time.
Good luck with that Sarkozy guy. We had Bush and we got Iraq. With Sarkozy, I am sure there will be some war out in Tahiti or French Guyana.
“American Capitalist God Fearers”?
Are you kidding me? Your banter with Laurent is always amusing; but don’t lump the rest of us Americans in with the above described group. While I wouldn’t want to live in any other country & think we are a nation founded on great priciples- those who claim “there’s nothing wrong” with our country & want to teach creationism in public schools are part of the problem, not the solution. Part of what made us strong as a nation was the ability to take dissenting voices & bring them into the fold through conversation & compromise. Somewhere those values have been replaced by fear-mongering & patriotic, jingoistic propoganda.
Here’s to ignorance! The best of which is served hot-headedly and freshly invented by Americans of the unenlightened variety.
Sarkozy’s father was an IMMIGRANT from HUNGARY. His mother was French. Sarkozy was born in France.
Why would I have to say I’m a BERLINER if I were a Frenchman living in your occupied France of the conjectural variety? Perhaps you just don’t know the word for a German in German, but trust me, I get your (dulled from overuse) point. My back aches from stooping to the lowest common denominators, but this is my penance for being here.
French consider employment to be a long term thing with responsibilities towards workers and salaries, and not the type of jobs hailed as employment by the Bush administration-minimum wage meet and greeters at the neighborhood WalMart, nor jobs created in New Delhi.
I can’t believe a christian fundy gave me the god-country-and-flag screed. I must show this to my beret and stripe shirt wearing socialist comrads so we can all give a long nasal laugh while twisting our moustaches. “Hyawwwwwwwyawwwwwwyawwwwww!”
Do you actually belive that the capitalists you bow to, but will never rise to, fear, or even believe in a god? (Well, I can picture the CEOs of ExxonMobil, Boeing, Blackwater, Bechtel, etc… praying for more people to exploit-and vote republican/democrat). There’s a reason why most of them can sleep so sound at night, and it’s not their fear of Mr. Makebelieve.
You’re first generation bourgeoisie at best, you have an education, own a house and think you’re on top. A bush votin’ poster boy. Cheers to your great success in life.
I suppose living in the USA, voting for Bush, sending cash to Fallwell (so sorry) and 700Club, and posting a yellow ribbon sticker on the V8 SUV you bought on 0.0% APR on the “Keep America Consumin’ (I mean Rollin’)” binge is what allows you to justify your tin crown Patriot title. My patriots tend to fall in the Chomsky and Chalmers variety (it takes a lot more guts to tell the emperor he is without clothes).
Nico, you couldn’t be more right. And as a jus soli américaine I share your fears of being lumped in. Ironic no?
Ciao
Well my French friend I hope you’re not saying Ciao for good. I would miss your snarky ass personally : )
I totally agree with what makes a patriot. I think people forget that revolutionary thinking is what forged this nation in the first place. Not going along with the status quo is kind of a cornerstone of this country- ironic ain’t it?
I’ve stopped mentioning the various “in jokes” inserted into Lost scripts, not because they aren’t still happening, but because it seemed as if it was getting to be a bit tired. However, there was one in this most recent episode that I can’t resist highlighting.
At the beginning, when Locke confronts Ben, demanding to know answers, Ben responds with something like “I wish it was as easy as pening up a dusty old book and reading the answers, but it’s not”. So the writers are telling us to just forget about the dozens of literary and other references in the show, at least to the extent that they provide any clue to what Jacob the Invisible Pirate might be. Thanks Lost writers!
Now we know why David Lynch had a quick end date for Twin Peaks.
TV is a tricky medium.
I think the Lost producers learned a “lesson” from the Twin Peaks debacle. It is come to be conventional wisdom that Twin Peaks faltered because the primary mystery of the series (who killed Laura Palmer ((it was her father Leland, possessed by a demon, as I recall))) (too many parentheticals — I know) was revealed too early in season 2. After that, the storylines were just not very gripping. So the makers of similar shows since then have been loath to give away the goods prematurely for fear of an immediate decline in viewership. The problem is that stringing people along for 3 seasons or more is equally frustrating. In a way, though, I think the Lost producers are correct in the manner they are doing things, to the extent that they didn’t want a repeat of Twin Peaks. Other than the primary mysteries of the island, there is really nothing else keeping people (outside of the blind followers) too interested. Could you imagine if the mysteries behind Smokey, the Polar Bears, Jacob, etc. . . were revealed and the creative staff had to focus on ways to keep us interested in the Jack/Kate/Sawyer/Juliet soap opera?
Exactly, but at the same time, they seem to proffer up new mysteries when the old ones collect dust and become mundane or simply dismissed as unanswerable.
I think they are doing a remarkable job considering, but what I detest, and can not reconcile, are the filler episodes where Hurley finds a VW and beer, and fringe characters are introduced and killed off. Sure, these episodes had some vague revelations, but an entire episode dedicated to them seemed excessive.
Perhaps we will learn from Lost what we learn from a viewing of almost any Lynch piece-that sometimes a mystery is just that, and is anyone’s guess.
I can agree with that mostly. That is the exact problem with shows that are created with one single arc that is the core of the whole show. It further makes the case for the argument of “extended mini-series” programs. Put some real thought in on the front end and create a cohesive, interesting story that is intended to only last 2 seasons.
“Oh, that will never happen because if the show is a hit, then the writers and the network will want to keep it going to make money”
Yes, but what if Lost’s producers and writers had created the show to only run 2 (or so) seasons and as a result were able to keep it performing at a high level right up until the end. The show would end on a huge high note and can you imagine the hype that would surround the next show these writers introduced? That’s why they advertise movies as “from the makers of (fill in the blank)”…because if their last show was a hit, they know people will be motivated to come check out the next big thing.
It’s the George Costanza “going out on a high note” idea. Always leave them wanting more. At this point, instead, Lost is going to be like one time when I went and saw the Red Hot Chili Peppers in concert. I was totally stoked and it was a great show for a while but their set was about 25-30 minutes too long. Seriously, by the end, even though I wasn’t going to just leave the show early, you could tell all of us in the crowd were like: “okay, let’s just get this over with so we can get home.”
News release from Foxnews:
“The survival of a major “Lost” character was left in doubt this week in an episode that shot adrenaline into the plot of the ABC series but failed to give it a needed ratings boost.
The Wednesday episode in which Locke (Terry O’Quinn) was shot, perhaps fatally, by Ben (Michael Emerson), the leader of “the Others,” drew 12.1 million viewers. That’s about the same sized audience the show has been attracting in recent weeks.
That compares to the 22 million-plus “Lost” drew at its peak last season, its second. Still, the drama about plane-crash survivors on a mysterious island has been winning its 10 p.m. EDT time slot among the young adult viewers prized by advertisers.
“Lost” also is building its audience within the hour, demonstrating that viewers who tune in like what they see. In this week’s pivotal episode, the audience got a history lesson about Ben’s troubled childhood and a clash between two island factions.
Given Locke’s importance to the show, the odds seem to be in his favor. But the producers have never been queasy about killing off characters who survived the crash but not the show’s complex plot twists.
ABC’s recent announcement that the show will conclude in the 2009-10 season also might have fans wondering if Locke’s shooting is a shocking early start to the show’s ultimate resolution.”
So all this hype, and still 12 million viewers. I’ll bet the finale draws back some of the faithful, I’d guess about 18 million will tune in for the finale just to see if the show still sucks, so I hope Evangeline Lilly was correct when she said the finale gave her goosebumps when she saw the story (from Jimmy Kimmel Live 5/9/07). I’m thinking she was a ploy, as will Matt Fox will be when he’s on tonight, to get viewers back by hyping up the episode. Better be a damn good one after all of this.
“producers have never been queasy about killing off characters who survived the crash but not the show’s complex plot twists.”
I feel like “Complex” isn’t the right word here. I think “contrived” would be much more accurate.
As far as the ratings decline goes it really comes down to two things:
1. American Idol
2. The move to 10/9 central
Once they get around it, all should fine.
One thing this ep did was get the buzz going through LOST geek-dom. With new characters and developments such as Jacob and the Hostiles, the LOST dweebies are launched into a fresch cycle of theorizing such as hasn’t been seen in a while.
My latest theory is that the whole thing is an enormous psychological experiment, far greater and more elaborate than just punching numbers in the hatch. The puppet masters who control Island are trying to manipulate the emotions and subsequent actions of their human guinea pigs to observe their responses to various stimuli, all done in an elaborate mind control scheme, likely with a goal of world domination.
However, the human guinea pigs are the *viewers* not the LOSTies, and the puppet masters are the producers and the network execs, not Jacob and the Hostiles.
Or maybe they’re just making a television show.
Did you ever see the episode of Southpark: “Cancelled” where Earth was just one big reality TV show for the rest of the galaxy to watch?
Maybe that’s whats going on here.
I don’t even know where to begin. I think I’ve finally gotten to that point. I honestly think I can wave goodbye to this nonsense and not even think about it anymore. I’ll admit I was a very avid fan for the first year. The second year was OK. This season is just horendous and the thing that’s really making me want to stop watching is the fact that people still vote these episodes 10s and go on and on about how incredible this show is. Now, I was planning on writing a fifty page thesis on all the negative points of this show and why it doesn’t just bother me but in fact actually enrages me like no other piece of pop culture ever could…but that would be boring so I figured I would condense my response here and just point out a few of the main plot holes and and convaluted turns the writers have decided to take lately.
1) Michael Emerson was never supposed to be on the show longer than three episodes. The writers have publicly stated this. Then why oh why has this entire season focused on him (more or less)? How can the writers claim they’ve had this planned out…if the “star” of this season wasn’t even supposed to be in the damn show?
2) The fact that the writers string us along with these plot lines for five or six episodes than out of nowhere throw some garbage plot twist in that renders the previous thinking of the fans moot. For example, we’ve been hearing about “others” since season one. I immediately thought, wow, some crazy psychic moutain people or something (that’s what I would have written anyway). They don’t reveal them at all until the finale when they abduct walt. Then the next season we think they are dharma employees (oh and they also lead us to believe that the tailies were the others for like three episodes when sawyer, jin and michael were taken) so the whole season all these thoughts are running around in my head thinking how cool is it that these crazy scientists are still there doing research on the island. But no, then in season 3 we find out that the others are actually not dharma employees but just some regular losers who were brought to the island for one reason or another. Later we think that the others are the mysterious hostiles that have been mentioned sporatically through out the past two years (sorry, but again, when Mikhail said hostiles I was thinking wow, crazy troll people or something bad ass) nope. Not even close. The hostiles are actually hmm, white guys who wear mascara and don’t age. I’m sorry but everything has just been a huge let down, in my eyes anyway.
3) Why was the lost experience plot the best part of the entire story so far? An equation the predicts the end of the world? Now we’re talking…The dharma initiative being founded to prevent it…this actually sounds like a good show to me! But no we get a lackluster ben flashback that portrays dharma as worthless hippies…who get killed off by a bunch of white guys.
I have to apologize, I know this post is long…but anyone who has some other annoyances, feel free to add to this.
Oh, and just a few other random thoughts before I go out and hunt down Damon Linelof and Carlton Cuse to demand they give me three years of my life back. What’s up with the fact that Ben didn’t know what the swan did, even though he cleaned the f*cking floors there for 30 years (I mean he was heading to the pearl to deliver beer with his dad)…doesn’t make any sense, or the timeline of the “incident” which no one talks about anymore. Ben would have been living there during “the incident” why didn’t they show us that in his flashback?!?!?
A funny thing I have noticed is that certain Lost lovers will rate every damn episode a “perfect 10.” Then when a half way decent episode comes along, they practically pee their pants, proclaiming how the latest “fantastic” episode makes up for the previous “disappointments”. But when those “disappointments” first aired, they had called them a “perfect 10″!
I feel for you, FatLip. I truly do. Great post. We don’t mind long-winded around here. As I’ve said above, I think that this episode was particularly damaging to any possibility of satisfactory resolution. They blew a golden opportunity in giving Ben such a pedestrian past and revealing the Dharma initiative to be nothing more than a gated community of former hippies with really bad hair. Gone the mystique and eerie tension on the show. And yet, as much as we like to crap on it, it’s still interesting enough to watch and bitch about. That said, I am quickly approaching my saturation point.
I totally agree. I remember when BEn entered the show pretending to be the balloon dude, and he was getting into everybody’s heads. I thought that he was a really awesome addition to the show. The moment went Sayid confronted Ben and told him that he dug up the grave by the balloon was one of my favorite moments in the entire show. There was a lot of tension between all the characters. I think they totally blew a great opportunity with Bens flashbacks.
Hey dude, that post was great. It made my night. Keep it coming. I totally agree with you.
1.) The producers decided to keep Emerson because of his acting skills. If they did not have Emerson they would have cast someone else to play Ben, the leader of the Others. The character existed from the beginning, is my point.
2.) There is supposed to be people we haven’t met yet on the island. Although, I’m not sure if we will see them before the finale.
3.) “Ben didn’t know what the swan did” – My theory on the subject is he did. I am an avid Synchronicity fan and this theory would explain Ben’s motives as soon as he found out he had a tumor. I recommend anyone that wants to read some intelligent theories (I realize reading just ANY theory can degrade the show of what it’s really worth) to go to Lost-theories.com. Unfortunately, the site is getting watered down by un-intelligent bimbo’s, but I recommend reading ProfOzone’s theories about Synchronicity. If you think it’s worth your time and you read them, I would like to hear what you have to say.
Neat site by the way..
On the subject of Jack the bitch: Chris D, that’s a very interesting point you make way above about Jack’s inexplicable status on the show. Obviously, the writers decided that Jack would play a leadership role on the series. Two problems with that: first, he is not “competent” to lead and secondly any goodwill and respect that he built up in the first season have long been exhausted. So, what is it about Jack that makes him so eminently qualified to lead especially in the face of growing resentment (and I hope they explore this tension in the group)? The answer is NOTHING but the fact that he is an eminent member of the annointed medical profession. Although his professional success as a surgeon would make him naturally inclined to assume a position of authority, he clearly does not have the gravitas or skills and command the respect that would prompt others to look to him for leadership. Things are pretty cushy for these people considering their predicament but there IS the threat of the Others and the concern about how to get off the island. So, I think that in the normal course of things people would necessarily converge towards a “natural leader” who inspires confidence and trust and has actual survival and strategic planning skills. In other words, not Jack. Isn’t it typically American to confuse prestige and social status with a certain kind of intelligence and to assign abilities and characteristics to someone in Jack’s position that they don’t actually have? “Duh.. he’s a doctor, so he has the bigger brain; he can make all the important decisions and tell us what to do.” There’s a doctoral thesis in there somewhere.
Which is really funny, because anybody who knows a Doctor (surgeons in particular) will tell you they would be a terrible choice as leader. By nature Doctors are self centered (surgeons doubly) & put their own ego before anything (they don’t save people because they’re such good folks, but because they like playing God). Now, in medical situations you’d be able to count on Jack always (was there ever a doubt he was going go save Ben? No, because to let him die would be admitting defeat); but otherwise he’d be pretty much the self centered (”What? You can send me home? How soon?”), moronic (”She’s under my protection”) person you see portrayed.
I think I watched 5 minutes of the beginning, took a shower, came back and saw the last 5 minutes.
All the scenes I saw included Ben and Locke.
All the scenes I saw revealed something new.
I actually enjoyed the episode.
I think I found a new way to watch Lost.
PS. I qualify that by saying I don’t think I can take another scene of Jack, Kate or Sawyer. Individually or together, I’m only human after all.
The basic “framework” of the show was planned from the beginning, and they know all the “big” things like answers to the mysteries, the story of the Others, what the final resolution is, etc.
However, within that basic framework, they have to account for certain unknowns and real-world problems. For example, the first 2 seasons they weren’t sure of how long the series would last, so they struggled with pacing/revealing backstory. They have to deal with actors wanting to leave the show (Mr. Eko) or new characters being unpopular (Nikki & Paulo). So in that regard, they have to come up with some things “on the fly”, and because of that there will naturally be some inconsistencies or dead-ends.
So, if you believe that line of BS the writers have been shoveling since the beginning, then when they have said that Ben was only going to be in 5 or 6 episodes originally, they knew all along that his character’s MAJOR role, as demonstrated this season and especially in this last episode, was all part of the plan?
I think there’s a clear flaw in that line of thinking. I think it would be hard to say that the whole personna of Ben as a central character and leader, the introduction of Ghostie to whom only Ben can talk, etc. etc. would be hard to sell as just stuff they decided “on the fly” to deal with external circumstances and NOT part of the big picture.
Is this team Darlton trying to defend the mess they’ve created? Does anyone else think this sounds like more than a uber fan trying to cover for their favorite show? Seems more like an infilitrator from the inside. Who is it? Carlton? Damon? JJ? Matt, is that you?
On a side note, saw Matt Fox on Jimmy Kimmel the other night, anyone else realize how high pitched his voice is? He obviously lowers it for the show. Also, it was revealed he just finished shooting for the season, so the final episode just wrapped for this season. Another thing he revealed is that he is one of the few who knows the whole story for lost, ie how it ends. Interesting.
Wow, no one bitched you out for calling them Darlton? So unfair!
I did that in tribute to you, Marc, uber fan. I was being very facecious.
Thanks, dude.
I would like to hear thoughts on Mrs. Meister’s question above regarding specific examples of plot threads that were advanced that should preclude the previous lines that they’ve allowed to disintegrate.
I’ve chosen to remove a lot of these specifics from my brain to save space for important stuff.
I can offer as one starting point the observation above of:
If the hostiles had destroyed Dharma on the island, then the Dharma corp. would have to be aware of that at some point so how / why were the “switch outs” at the Swan station still occurring with Desmond and before him, the sargent from Starship Troopers who knew Sayid in Iraq.
This may not necessarily be impossible (I can’t remember all the details) but that doesn’t mean there aren’t other clear plot contradictions that I can’t remember.
Maybe the timeline of the “incident” (which I can’t remember by this point which “incident” this is referring to) and that Ben should have been around at that time? (mentioned by Fatlip previously)
There are many inconsistencies that those more familiar with the minutiae of the show have already addressed or can speak to. To me, THE most glaring examples of inconsistency are the characters themselves. Sayid, Sawyer, Locke and even Ben are all examples of characters who have behaved incredibly inconsistently over the past three season. And not in the way that all human beings do but rather in the way of badly written characters who are merely there to serve the particular needs of the plot. But to echo Stickman’s question and Re LMeister’s rhetorical query above: “Has there actually been anything ‘proven’ inconsistent? I know so much happens that is unexplained and we can’t figure out how it all fits together, but, have the writers screwed up to the point where we can say they have contradicted themselves … [?]“. What are the most outrageous examples of inconsistency in the story thus far?
In addition, after the “hostiles” wiped out the Dharma village (15 or 20 years ago), whoever ran Dharma off the island continued the massive food drops (which the Losties received in the episode in season 2 when Sayid and AnaL returned from the balloon expedition). It’s difficult to believe that Dharma could be mostly wiped out on the island, and yet their off island connection would be so clueless as to continue dropping food and supplies on a regular basis for so long.
which is just one of the MANY holes in the plot of this show (tiny they may be, but they still exist all over the place)
I think the explanation for that is Patchy is a Dharma original, and probably reluctantly agreed to work for them, and they probably needed him due to his comm skills. He probably sends the message that everything is OK, so that’s why they still air drop stuff. Here’s something to ponder, though, in the Man behind the curtain episode, it appeared they got pallets delivered to them via the sub or some ship, if so, why the airdrops?
Or, when Locke and the others were in the observation hatch, they saw patchy, so was Patchy being observed or was he in some other station? If so, why did he stray away from the comm station? Of course, this will all be answered in episode 118, a point in which no one will really give a crap.
Dharma wasn’t wiped out after the purge. Seems as if the Others/Hostiles had little to no idea about the Swan hatch, hence the food drop may have had something to do with the lockdown from season 2. Perhaps the Others were able to do just enough to fool their connection to the outside world.
Thanks Stickman for bringing this back up. After reading everything above, I am still not convinced that there are any contradictions. I do not consider personality changes a flaw in the storyline. And the food drops can be explained away. It doesn’t seem logical perhaps, but they could do it. What I want to know, have they ever said this is ‘A’, only to turn around and say this is not ‘A’, but ‘B’.
I don’t think they have, Anyone else?
Mrs. Meister
The point about the characters going to hell is key when discussing the decline of the show. People who overlooked the “nevermind” plot mysteries have still given up on the show because the characters have been turned into complete idiots.
i would rather lubricate an elephant and shove it down my dickhole than have to sit through another episode of lost.
peace.
You are an idiot and if you have nothing better to say than crude nonsense, why not keep it to your self.
Mrs. Meister
i would have chosen hippo, but otherwise i agree
oh i agree with him, not you.
what’s the problem? a guy mentions that he doesn’t like lost on whylostsucks.com & you wanna give him shit… what a strange world. i personally find humor in crude nonsense. i mean…just imagine how much lube it would take to lube up an entire elephant.
i don’t even own a tube of lube…let alone many tubes of lube that would necessitate an entire lube rack…what am i gonna do with a lube rack?
then…what kind of device are you gonna use to hoist the lubricated elephant…& how on earth will you succeed in shoving it down the dick hole…
i mean…an elephant inside of a dick hole…that’s like a 747 in a bathroom. if ya really really think about it the lube won’t even make a difference.
so basically what is being said is…
he’d rather succeed at doing something impossible then watch another episode of lost…
who wouldn’t?
i mean…succeeding at something impossible would kick ass…cuz well…it’s impossible
I just thought it was crude. Most of y’all keep it relatively clean and yet manage to be very funny. Perhaps you do not care what I think, but I think you should use better manners. That comment might be fine with men only, but in the presence of ladies, you should show a little class.
Mrs Meister, please keep in mind the primary posters here are men between the ages of 18- 35. A notoriously gross, crass, tasteless & immature group to say the least. Please forgive us these momentary lapses of reason & remember we are MEN after all (& therefore at least partially retarded).
Nico, I understand this, and overall I am not easily offended. I just think “ihatelostwiththepassionofathousandsuns” was over the top. I do appreciate most posts as they challenge me to think and/or just make me laugh, but I didn’t appreciate his vulgarity. Not that HE asked, but for you, all is forgiven.
Mrs. Meister
Well I’m male and 38 but mentally about 10. And I prefer “mentally challenged”.
This comment is so retarded
-Mr. Meister
What happened to Vincent? I haven’t seen him for a while, does anyone recall the dog being in a recent episode? Solve that one, team Darlton.
As for contradictions, I think they’ve been pretty good about not having any, but it doesn’t mean there haven’t been some slight inconsistencies, at least to the viewer. Think about the inconsistencies, and you probably have a piece of the overall puzzle. One thing I think about is what about the hatch the tailies were in? And why don’t we get to see Claire breastfeed? I think some key clues have come out recently, saying there are “more rooms on the island than you think” (whatever that means). I think since they got the go ahead before the final episode this season that there’s going to be a big piece revealed in the finale.
I’m still pissed about the pace of the show, don’t get me wrong, but I think the past couple of episodes are heading in the right direction. As I prepare to inject myself tomorrow night, I only hope I can get that rush again. The biggest complaint will be having to wait until February 2008 to see the next season, I may actually lose interest at that point. I mean football can carry me to January, but February is a litte long to wait. Maybe they’ll have some teaser specials on like Heroes is doing to keep the appetite wet. 7 months, geez.
Vincent, the dog of death, should be back in time for the finale. I heard he had some other side-projects he had been working on as well as a guest appearance on Entourage.
Just read the spoilers for the next two episodes, and if it’s true they look to be really good. There’s a twist at the end (supposedly), and if true, will change the entire show as we know it. Although the last time I read the spoilers he was right, I don’t think it detracts from watching, it actually makes me want to watch because it’s a tease as to the whole story. I won’t give anything major out, but here’s a tease, stop reading if you don’t want to know (remember this could be a foiler but the guy was dead on last time). Locke is saved by somebody we haven’t seen in a while who’s name rhymes with salt.
Enjoy!
Well, that will be a nice slap in the face as I’m left to ponder to the return of “Salt” until January ‘08. Nothing like a meaningless cliffhanger just before the summer/fall break.
Actually the return won’t be until February, remember there’s only 16 episodes and they’ll be back to back until May sweeps final. Read the spoiler site, I won’t regurgitate it here, but I’m shocked at the twist, and if it’s true, then damn! If you don’t read, then wait until the final episode discussion, I can’t wait for that if what was said is true. I’m still not believing til seeing, though. Salt comes and goes, BTW, after “saving” Locke.
When he returns,Salt will be big enough to carry Locke on his back
Just read all the spoilers & quite frankly it all sounds a bit ridiculous. Just some shit to make you go “wtf just happened?” until season 4’s late start (shades of the four toed statue). What is more telling is that none of the big mysteries (primarily WHO is Jacob? Where exactly has “Salt” been? etc.etc.) will be answered by the finale of this horrible season. You think after losing a full half the viewers the writers would’ve thrown us a bone; but no- instead we get a big DUM DUM DUM(B) moment that will just leave us frustrated & kicking ourselves waiting for more (kind of like my high school girlfriend…). Once again showing the complete disdain the producers of this show have for their audience. Will I be around to watch? Well, I’ve been doing a lot of posturing about that lately; but if I’m being honest: You bet your sweet bippy I will be (if only to moan about it on this website). Well, that admission should make JT & Marc very happy anyway…
It doesn’t change the show as we know it. It only means that they eventually get off the island and that they will fool us into thinking that Jack’s flash ahead in the finale is actually a flashback. So the hell what? The only thing it does is ruin any mystery as to whether they get off the island. So the next three seasons will be devoted to why leaving the island will be such a mistake (we already know it is). When I first read the spoilers, I thought it might mean that ALL of the flashbacks have actually been flash aheads, but, after considering it for a moment, I realized that can’t possibly be true.
Nope, we know it’s all stuff that already happened. I agree, it’s a cheap shot that doesn’t really tell us shit- just wets our chops for something that they may or may not follow through on (seeing how at this rate the show may or may not get cancelled before then). It’s all a big kick in the nards to the viewers; but of course the fan sites will be abuzz all summer talking about how “groundbreaking” it all was.
I think ABC can afford to have Lost go down in the ratings, it’s a top 20 show now, and even if it drops to top 30 or 50, they’ll still get it back in DVD sales. Plus, I truly think they’ll spin it off somehow, how about “Jack Shephard, MD”? Or a fugitive show starring Kate & Sawyer? Something that will explore they’re celebrity of being found after presumed death, with flashbacks to the island and things we didn’t see in the original run. Or even better, a show about the Dharma Initiative starring Marvin Candle.
I liked the twist of Jack being distraught after getting off the island, and what I like about the teaser/foiler is if they’ll go into how they got off and what happened to everyone. Maybe they all got killed save Jack and Kate and that is why he’s so messed up.
The thing that still sits in the back of my mind is how Desmond said he “Sailed for days” and did nothing but come right back to the island, yet Michael and Walt are given a vector and they apparently make it. So there has to be a way to get on/off the island, and I think Walt’s return means Michael has figured it out and come back to rescue them. Or, since dead people appear at random, maybe they died, sent to their death by Ben, and now their ghosts are coming back to help the Losties.
I’m actually excited about the episodes coming, though when I go into detox this summer, fall and winter, I may not have the willpower to shoot up with Lost again. OK, I know, I’m a junkie and I’ll be shooting up in February like everyone else.
I’m hoping and praying this “spoiler” isn’t true.
I can’t believe I have such weak willpower as to subject myself to one more moment of this show! Every episode gives promise that we will see some direction, but every time we get more bs questions. We are introduced to subjects that are never returned to. Now another secret hatch? WTF??? Of course it gets blown up, so it will never be discussed or explained.
I promise myself that I will not haunt any of these forums until next Feb. My brain would to explode from all the “Salt is Smokey” and “Who was/is Naomi?” crap.
This show is going to give me a stroke.
Here’s my take on the spoilers — I read ‘em a couple of days ago.
The Greatest Hits spoilers are, as far as I know, completely and 100 percent legitimate. Granted, tonight’s episode looks like more of a set-up ep, without too many secrets revealed.
BUT! There’s been some massive buzz circulating that the alleged spoiler posted for the 2-hour finale is, in fact, a foiler planted by the writers. The twist in the purported spoiler is somewhat mindblowing I guess, though I’d have to see how it plays out in the episode before judging it. That being said, if the twist IS true, then I really wish I hadn’t read the spoiler.
So we’ll really have no way of knowing until next Wednesday, I guess, but everything that is alleged to have happened in tonight’s episode will, most likely, happen.
And it’s a Charlie episode! I know how much you guys love Charlie!
Basically, they said pretty much nothing happens in this episode & it just sets us up for next week. I have no clue if the spoilers for next week are true, but as far as the “big one” goes; if it IS true I have only one thing to say: big fat hairy freakin’ deal. It’s just another lame twist to keep us satiated until next year when they will continue to ignore the questions we actually want answered.
You serious, bro? One of the biggest questions of the series, in my mind, is whether or not these chuckleheads are ever going to get off the island. If that big twist is true, that’s a pretty unequivocal yes, at least two of them do escape. I’m still not sure whether or not I actually like this twist, or what it would do to the show.
Unfortunately, one of the two people who DO (supposedly) escape is the lamest character on the show, and this also means that Kate will not die while on the island. That really sucks.
I’m not shocked to hear the two most popular characters on the show are going to escape, are you? The big questions are about everything in between & those questions remain unresolved. Come on JT, be honest: wouldn’t you rather know what the fuck is up with the four toed statue, or who is Jacob, or what happened to Michael & Walt, or who are Richard Alpern & the natives, or one of any hundred other questions that have been posed over the last 3 seasons? It’s just another OMG moment to get your mind off of the other things that they’re still figuring out.
Absolutely right, man — I want all of those answers, of course. And honestly, the way I saw the ending playing out was with them never escaping the island at all. So to say it was a ginormous shock to me that some people escaped would be an overstatement, it surprised me that the writers were willing to tell us that yes, there’s a way off the island, and that some people escaped. And Kate sucks, by the way.
As far as the other unanswered questions go — like I said, I definitely want answers too. But we have 54 episodes left, and [crosses fingers] hopefully the creators will listen to the complaints out there and answer absolutely everything.
What gets me, though, is that the vast majority of people are bitching about how 54 episodes is far too much Lost, and that it should have ended after one more season, or whatever. If the show had ended after one more season, there would be an utter shitload of questions left unanswered, leaving people pissed. Now that the writers have announced 54 episodes — which is plenty of time to answer all of the questions out there — people are bitching that the show is going on too long. You know I love making my stuck-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place metaphor, so I won’t do it here, but it seems a wee bit hypocritical to me.
[gets off soapbox]
I just think they should have planned it out for four seasons from the get- go & not posed so many meaningless questions. Part of what has killed the show is the decline in quality all around. The first season, every episode was like mini-movie. We all know you can’t sustain that for long. Writers lose focus, actors get other gigs, production costs sky-rocket, etc. So instead of letting it all go to shit, why not just focus on a few high quality seasons from the start? I know there’s money to be made, but the BBC does it all the time & they’re not exactly crying poor. Just how I see things.
Concur with Nico. Should have planned from the beginning (just in case) for this to run 4 or 5 seasons, I think they’ve stated many times they envisioned a 100 episode run which is like 4 years. They could conceivably wrap it up in one more 22 episode season, but there would be no suspense, kind of like, what secret gets revealed tonight and it would just suck even more. This is all about money folks, don’t kid yourself into thinking anything else. 3 more seasons means 6 box sets instead of 4 or 5.
I will say if the Kate and Jack get off the island twist is correct, then it will be interesting how next year will go, like did they get off at the end of season 3 or was it years in the future? I guess we’ll see next week.
I don’t doubt at all that the revelations of the season finale are “foilers” as they have been called. It would be completely consistent with the way the producers have been so lazy with the show lately. They aren’t confident enough in the actual show, so they plant “foilers” to make people think one thing, then do something completley different to add to the shock value. They want to play with the expectations of the audience because, without those expectations, the audience won’t be as thrilled. Now, when the finale reveals some other contrived twist, people will be more “shocked” because it is so different from the “foiler” they planted.
Ya know, I never really considered the fact that this spoiler was actually a “foiler” (Lord, that’s silly…). Every other spoiler I’ve read at the site has been dead on all season. I suppose anything is possible, but I bet you either way the big season cliff hanger will have nothing to do with the larger mysteries (& mythology) of the show as a whole.
“They aren’t confident enough in the actual show, so they plant “foilers” to make people think one thing, then do something completley different to add to the shock value.”
What? I have no idea how you could come to this conclusion. Not everyone reads spoilers — in fact, I’d say the vast majority of Lost viewers out there don’t even know that complete episodes are being spoiled on the Internet. So yes, maybe the 5% of the viewing population would be shocked by this foiler, but the rest of the viewership wouldn’t even know it existed.
Just another one of Tommy’s vast right wing conspiracy theories (or something like that, heh). Personally all I know is whatever the big twist is, it ain’t gonna’ answer any of the burning questions. So I’ll just wait until the season finale before I comment on whether it will even qualify as being clever or not.
I would agree with that regarding most of the spoilers, but this particular one seems to be circulating everywhere. Even my grandmother probably knows about it by now. Assuming the finale rumor is a “foiler” (and I really hate that word), then the producers are doing it for some reason, and my explanation seems as reasonable as any other I have read.
Can’t really argue with you there Tommy, I really wouldn’t put a crass publicity stunt of any kind past “Team Darlton (BARF!)”. Plus, Lost seems to breed fans that love spoilers (as well as crack pot theories), so I’m sure a lot more folks than you think have seen the so called spoiler we are talking about. I too hate the word foiler & want to kill it…
That really is a good point, Tommy — this particular spoiler originated from some random dude who posts on one of the massive Lost fansites (and if you Google most of his posts, he appears to be either 12 years old or a really crappy typist), which does lend credence to it being released intentionally.
After thinking about the “twist” for a while, I’m starting to really not want it to be true.
Whew! I spent a luxurious weekend in Lake Tahoe & missed some kick ass posts.
You mean you didn’t bring a wireless laptop? What kind of non-fan are you?
He is clearly not the non-fan we thought he was. No wonder it’s still under 250 posts for the week.
Yes, well what can I say? I only really missed one day of posting (Monday) as on the weekends I’m pretty much internet free for the sake of my sweety (i.e.: her to do list takes priority *sound of whip cracking*). Still, I’m glad I wasn’t around for the off- topic discussion about the recently elected French government.
“(i.e.: her to do list takes priority *sound of whip cracking*)”
Yet MORE proof that Nico and I are, indeed, the exact same person.
Nice to know you feel my pain brotha.
you both love it and you know it,
Mrs. Meister
Not really complaining- just stating the facts ma’m. I have no desire to return to the dating game at this stage in life, that’s for sure.
Amen to that, dude.
check these out
youtubedotcom/watch?v=IWKPbQbs6EU
youtubedotcom/watch?v=-YPL_e2jgHw
change the ‘dot’ to ‘.’
Mrs. Meister
Some good stuff, the one in the elevator is really funny.
here is another one…
youtubedotcom/watch?v=1nzw9ZmMAiM
Mrs. Meister
I have been meaning to make mention of this for the past few days. Some person named Fatlip wrote a post that was like the equivalent of War & Peace for this site. Basically, he went off on the fact that Michael Emerson was never supposed to be on the show for an extended amount of time, that the writers are making the story up as it goes along, and if I were to answer everything he mentioned, I would be here until Saturday. I look at Lost a lot like a road map. The layout of the towns are always going to be in the exact same place, however you always have more than one way to get from town A to town B. I don’t understand why people have such a problem that parts of the show are evolving as it goes. Give the two assholes credit for recognizing that Emerson turned out to be a much better actor than anyone realized, that the character of Ben has turned out to be a fascinating villain to the overall story. If he doesn’t get Emmy recognition, it will be criminal. Yet, the funny part was that he though the Lost Experience was “the best part.” Maybe for curing insomnia, but little else.
I agree that the Lost Experience was sleep inducing & that Michael Emerson’s reptilian countenance has made him an effective villian. However, the writers haven’t helped his Emmy hopes (any more than they’ve helped any of the shows other stars) by writing him a scene where he argues with an empty chair.
Even if it was the worst scene in television history, it shouldn’t take away from the body of work. Take out the “shakin shack” and the rest of the interplay between Locke & Linus is spectacular. I can’t really make as strong an Emmy case for anyone else, the rest are more like role players. Plus, I did the frame by frame and I am sure it was Kris Kristofferson in that chair.
I can see KK as well, but honestly to me it looked like Locke. He’s got that really distinct bullbously round forehead & chin (like a Punch doll or something).
I can’t agree with you on this one. If they had said that they had intended to only have a minor character on for a few episodes but realized he was such a good actor that they kept him on for awhile then that’s one thing. But in this case, I think it would be hard to argue that the entire concept of where the show is at currently wouldn’t be significantly different if they hadn’t decided to keep Emerson on there…meaning, you can’t say you had this major part of the overall theme planned from the beginning. This isn’t finding a different way to go from city A to city B. This is realizing there’s no good way to get from city A to city B on the map so you draw in a new city right where you are at.
But who’s to say, though, that the writers hadn’t already planned some big bad Other villain? If they were, it would have been pretty easy to write Emerson into that role.
I know. It’s a stretch, even by my standards.
Can’t post yet on the new thread yet, but this episode, to me, was undoubtedly the worst one of the season. What a waste of time.
I loved it. It will be undoubtedly hated by everyone on this board (because there were no answers, really), I thought it was a great character-driven episode with some poignant moments. And because I am, apparently, a gigantic puss, I got a little teary when Charlie said goodbye to Hurley.
I actually don’t think I’m going to even post on Tyler’s new blog entry on this one, because I’ll be too damn saddened by the vitriol (and I’m sure the word “hobbit” will be bandied around at least 500 times in reference to the actor playing Charlie). I also predict the words “filler” and “pointless” will be used, though I prefer the term “set-up for 2-hour finale”.
(sighs)
OMG, JT have you lost your friggin’ mind? You were teary-eyed at the Fat-boy hug? I was laughing my ass off at the “you’re too fat to fit in the boat”. Did you ever see Dumb and Dumber? I swear Hurley looks like Jeff Daniels in the dog suit in the beginning of the movie. He is so pathetic.
And come on, man, you can’t give up now – there is only one episode left and then what will happen? 8 months to wonder how it will suck next season.
It’s probably because Charlie is one of my favorite characters on the show (as is Hurley — if I’m not mistaken, Lmeister, I believe you loathe Hurley quite a bit).
But nope. I’m just a sensitive soul, Hurley and Charlie had a lot of history, and it was (in my opinion) extremely well-acted on essentially all parts. The flashbacks were used in a pretty unique way, too, which was kind of cool. And I’ve always been fonder (again, this is just me) of the episodes that try to tug at your emotions rather than slam answers in your face.
For my sake, guys — Nico, Tommy, all youse guys — go easy on this one, willya? Please? I know that this is Why Lost Sucks, et cetera et cetera, but cmon! Just this once!
Postscript — here’s why I like the dialogue much better here, because here’s one of the most idiotic criticisms I’ve ever seen of the show, foisted from a different message board:
“…Charlie didn’t have to smack Desmond with a paddle, nor did he have to leave the ring in the crib where Aaron might choke on it.”
Pisses me off. Who notices this shit, seriously?
JT, “no answers given” are you for real dude? We got the biggest mystery EVER solved. We can all go to sleep tonight knowing that Charlie’s ring does not stand for Drive Shaft. Sleep in peace buddy.
Mrs. Meister
I just got an idea, new idea. Thank you buddy for your article